Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: Arkaign
The Altima V6 6spd Coupe would be a good fit for you I think.
270HP
6-Speed Manual or 5-Speed Auto
FWD (better than RWD for inclement weather, without the expensive maintenance of AWD)
Fresh design for '08
Roomier for passengers, decent backseat
Looks a lot like a G35
Cheap insurance
No turbo = lower maintenance as well
$24k with good options
So, lots of pluses 🙂
So, why exactly does a turbo or AWD = more maintenance?
😕
Also, you are suggesting FWD like it's the best option??? OMG...you're killing me!
😀
Well, it should be plainly obvious that with either/or a Turbo or AWD, you have more moving parts. That means more things that have scheduled maintenance on, and at the same time, more things that can break and need replacement.
FWD is constantly bagged on by ignorant people. There's nothing wrong with FWD on a car, unless you're expecting it to be (A)- a race car, or (B)- an off-road vehicle. Particularly with less than 300hp, it makes very little difference with handling, driving, etc.
Furthermore, as anyone who's driven a truck (or Mustang, Vette, etc), in the snow or rain can tell you : you have to be damned careful driving in slick weather with RWD. The rear end will swing around very easily. Of course, you still have to be careful in an AWD or FWD vehicle, but the advantage of the front wheels pulling you along as opposed to the rear wheels pushing you along is quite obvious to anyone with either the smallest inkling of physics or any reasonable driving experience in slick road conditions.
So yes, FWD or AWD > RWD for bad weather, and FWD has the added bonus of having lower maintenance costs as well. FWD is nearly as cheap to maintain as RWD.
There should be some kind of automatic forum demerit system in the Garage for every ignorant bashing of FWD.
Would I want a 400HP FWD Vette? NO.
Would I be happy with a 270HP FWD decent-handling daily driver? YES.