waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
Originally posted by: moshquerade
yeh, and if it were a female porn star she wouldn't have been fired.Originally posted by: newnameman
Yep, employers can "discriminate" against porn stars all they want.Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Abe Froman
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Abe Froman
At the same time,, one could argue a gay porn star did not help to hold up the standard of a family friendly restaurant. I could be wrong... you tell me. But if I owned a family frequented restaurant, I don't think I would want an adult film star (former or current) of any orientation working in my establishment.
how would anyone know unless they were gay though?
of ANY ORIENTATION...
read it, man
Still, what's the problem, as long as they're not screwing customers on the dessert cart?
That is for the business owner to decide. Obviously he has a problem with it.
No, it's discrimination, and I hope the store owner gets the crap sued out of him. :thumbsup:
You obviously know nothing of what you speak. You can fire employees for out of work behavior. Subway will say he didnt get fired because he was gay (which would be descrimination) but because he starred in adult film (Pornstar is not a protected class of citizen). Reading comprehension FTL.
hell no.
they would have a buy a "foot long" get a free movie!
