- Aug 25, 2004
- 11,151
- 1
- 81
Originally posted by: txrandom
Why are jocks usually dumb?
what makes someone a jock? someone who is athletic? someone who is built?Originally posted by: txrandom
Why are jocks usually dumb?
Originally posted by: moshquerade
what makes someone a jock? someone who is athletic? someone who is built?Originally posted by: txrandom
Why are jocks usually dumb?
i don't see where muscular athletic people are any dumber than the gen population, in fact, i'll venture they are above average in intelligence on the whole.
so you are saying that this study (sited by the OP) is bunk?Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: moshquerade
what makes someone a jock? someone who is athletic? someone who is built?Originally posted by: txrandom
Why are jocks usually dumb?
i don't see where muscular athletic people are any dumber than the gen population, in fact, i'll venture they are above average in intelligence on the whole.
The National IQ test in the Netherlands always asks several groups of people to participate. Bodybuilders scored under average.
They scored about 20 points lower than the canabis smokers, who had just smoked canabis before the show, and also been tested prior to that. Without having used canabis they scored about 5-10 points lower than with
(Probably because of being more relaxed after smoking)
Originally posted by: txrandom
Why are jocks usually dumb?
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
The National IQ test in the Netherlands always asks several groups of people to participate. Bodybuilders scored under average.
They scored about 20 points lower than the canabis smokers, who had just smoked canabis before the show, and also been tested prior to that. Without having used canabis they scored about 5-10 points lower than with
(Probably because of being more relaxed after smoking)
Originally posted by: leftyman
I wonder why that happens?
Body Building != Cardiac Exercise
Anaerobic Training does nothing but build muscle. Aside from physical stress, there is no effect on the body (ie Oxygen supply)
Originally posted by: dawza
Body Building != Cardiac Exercise
Anaerobic Training does nothing but build muscle. Aside from physical stress, there is no effect on the body (ie Oxygen supply)
Oh really? I suppose the reductions in blood pressure and improvements in insulin sensitivity, plasma lipids, and markers of oxidative stress have nothing to do with the body or the cardiovascular system?
There are many, many studies which have demonstrated a significant improvement in VO2 max as a result of resistance training, as well as other forms of anaerobic exercise (i.e. high-intensity interval training). I can provide references if you like.
Do a heavy set of squats or sprint 50m, and tell me that you do not feel any effects on your cardiac system.
Originally posted by: irishScott
Originally posted by: dawza
Body Building != Cardiac Exercise
Anaerobic Training does nothing but build muscle. Aside from physical stress, there is no effect on the body (ie Oxygen supply)
Oh really? I suppose the reductions in blood pressure and improvements in insulin sensitivity, plasma lipids, and markers of oxidative stress have nothing to do with the body or the cardiovascular system?
There are many, many studies which have demonstrated a significant improvement in VO2 max as a result of resistance training, as well as other forms of anaerobic exercise (i.e. high-intensity interval training). I can provide references if you like.
Do a heavy set of squats or sprint 50m, and tell me that you do not feel any effects on your cardiac system.
Sprinting is not Anaerobic. And while the effects of anaerobic exercise may be beneficial, I still doubt they effect the entire body as much as cardio.
In any case, that's why I enjoy rowing. Best of both worlds