Study finds sexting by adolescents is normal part of sexual development

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Study finds sexting by adolescents is not a predictor of later risky sexual behavior, may be normal part of sexual development

Provocative new research suggests sexting may be a new “normal” part of adolescent sexual development and is not strictly limited to at-risk teens.

Researchers have published their findings on teenage sexting and future sexual activity in the journal Pediatrics.

Sexting is sending sexually explicit images over digital media, primarily between cell phones.

Researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston say the study results indicate that sexting may precede sexual intercourse in some cases.

Investigators believe this shows that sexting behavior is a normal sign of teenage sexual activity. This belief is buttressed by the failure to discover a link between sexting and risky sexual behavior over time.

In other words, sexting may be becoming a part of growing up.

“We now know that teen sexting is fairly common,” said Dr. Jeff Temple, an associate professor and psychologist at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB).

“For instance, sexting may be associated with other typical adolescent behaviors such as substance use. Sexting is not associated with either good or poor mental well-being.”

“Despite this growing body of knowledge, all existing sexting research looks across samples of different groups of young people at one time, rather than following the same people over time,” said Temple.

“Because of this, it’s unclear whether sexting comes before or after someone engages in sexual activity,” he said.

Temple and colleagues have been following a diverse group of adolescents in southeast Texas for six years.

The teens in the study periodically complete anonymous surveys detailing their history of sexting, sexual activity, and other behaviors throughout the years.

In the analysis, Temple and a postdoctoral research fellow at UTMB, Hye Jeong Choi, Ph.D., examined data from the second and third years of their study to determine whether teen sexting predicted sexual activity one year later.

They found that the odds of being sexually active as high school juniors was slightly higher for youth who sent a sext, or naked picture of themselves, the previous year, compared to teens who did not sext.

Just as importantly, they did not find sexting to be linked with later risky sexual behaviors.

An important component of the study is the distinction between actively sending a nude picture versus asking or being asked for a nude picture. Researchers found that actually sending a sext was the important part of the link between sexting and sexual behavior, as opposed to merely asking or being asked for a nude picture.

“Being a passive recipient of or asking for a sext does not likely require the same level of comfort with one’s sexuality,” said Choi.

“Sending a nude photo may communicate to the recipient a level of openness to sexual activity, promote a belief that sex is expected, and serve to increase sexual advances, all of which may increase the chance of future sexual behavior.”

Researchers conclude that sexting may serve as a predictor behavior to actual sexual behaviors, or as activity that indicates one’s readiness to take intimacy to the next level.

-----------------------------------------------------------

In my opinion kids have always looked at naked pictures out of curiosity when they start coming of age, and have always experimented with other kids sexually at early ages, all of this is normal. The only difference is that sexting can now destroy your life if it remains on the internet and someone comes across it like a potential boss, or even god forbid a predator.

Thoughts?
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
The fact they are paying people to study this is pretty weak to begin with.

Is more like common sense, if it's there will be used.

Hell, I remember just calling girls in high school 35 years ago and having conversations for an hour sometimes on a land line, this really isn't news, just dating with newer tech.
 
Last edited:

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,336
136
The fact they are paying people to study this is pretty weak to begin with.

Is more like common sense, it's there will be used.
Your tax $$ at work....

Who was the old sex/child studies DR that let his pedo friends have a go?
 
Last edited:

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
They found that the odds of being sexually active as high school juniors was slightly higher for youth who sent a sext, or naked picture of themselves, the previous year, compared to teens who did not sext.

Only slightly? So what they're saying is that even if no one is interested in Chester Bloomingbutte's hawt n00dz, it's still sexting as long as he keeps sending them to his peers?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,953
44,817
136
The only difference is that sexting can now destroy your life if it remains on the internet and someone comes across it like a potential boss, or even god forbid a predator.


I'd rather this country pull it's head out of it's collective ass about sex. You have to wonder sometimes about a populace that thinks watching a graphic murder is somehow less traumatizing than the nip slip of the week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.