• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Study Finds 'Mind-Boggling' Rise in Morbid Obesity

Amused

Elite Member
Morbid Obesity Affects More Americans
By Nanci Hellmich
USA Today
(April 10) - The prevalence of American adults who are 100 or more pounds over a healthy weight has risen dramatically since 2000, a study released Monday shows.

About 3% of people, or 6.8 million adults, were morbidly obese in 2005, up from 2% or 4.2 million people in 2000, says Roland Sturm, an economist with the RAND Corp., a non-profit think tank.

The evidence of such a significant increase in the number of Americans who are extremely heavy "is mind-boggling," he says.

Sturm analyzed government data on about 1.5 million people who reported their own weights and heights. Participants were categorized as severely or morbidly obese if they had a body mass index (a height-weight ratio) of 40 or higher.

According to government data, about 66% of people in the USA are now either overweight or obese, which is defined as 30 or more pounds over a healthy weight. Obesity increases a person's risk of contracting numerous diseases, including diabetes, heart diseases and cancer.

Sturm's study, which was released Monday on the website of the journal Public Health, shows that 24.6% of people were obese in 2005, up from 20% in 2000. That's an increase of 24%.

People usually under report their weight, so the percentage of people who are morbidly obese is actually higher than 3%, Sturm says. A large government survey in which people are actually weighed and measured suggests that about 5% of U.S. adults are morbidly obese and a third are obese, Sturm says.

He says his analysis highlights the dramatic increase in the number of morbidly obese people over a relatively short period of time.

"Even though we've had an explosion of bariatric surgery in that time, it doesn't seem to have made a dent in these numbers," he says. Bariatric surgery often reduces the size of the stomach.

For years, some experts believed that severe obesity was a rare condition that affected a fixed percentage of the population that might be more predisposed to weight gain for genetic or metabolic reasons, Sturm says.

"But these numbers show the trend is really paralleling what is going on in our society," he says. To help reverse the numbers, "we need to move to a healthier environment with friendlier staircases and more walkable environments," Sturm says.

George Blackburn, associate director of nutrition at Harvard Medical School, calls the increase in the percent of severely obese people a catastrophe.

"It is an emergency because the disability, the discrimination and the health care costs for this population are enormous," he says.
 
I didn't need a study to tell me this. Just go to any public place to see it with your own eyes. It's disgusting. I was at Target yesterday and too 500 pounders were blocking an isle in their rascal.
 
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.
 
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Kinda sad, actually. The very genetic traits that ensured survival in times of feast and famine and constant physical labor for food are backfiring on us now.
 
This will probably be one of those self-correcting problems. It's a good example why universal healthcare doesn't work. If you cause the problem, you pay to fix it.
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Kinda sad, actually. The very genetic traits that ensured survival in times of feast and famine and constant physical labor for food are backfiring on us now.

To be fair, it would take a lots of laps around the mall to make up for 33,000 calories per day 😉
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Kinda sad, actually. The very genetic traits that ensured survival in times of feast and famine and constant physical labor for food are backfiring on us now.

To be fair, it would take a lots of laps around the mall to make up for 33,000 calories per day 😉

And then some people have defects that cause an unending insatiable hunger that literally drives them crazy. But that's an extreme case. 😛
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Actually, just the activity of walking does next to nothing for fat loss. I think walking for an hour probably burns fewer than 100 calories. Fat loss is primarily a matter of diet.
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Kinda sad, actually. The very genetic traits that ensured survival in times of feast and famine and constant physical labor for food are backfiring on us now.

You don't need to be active to be skinny. It is lack of willpower and self control. No amount of physical activity will help these people without willpower.
 
People are becoming more and more lazy and stupid with a sense of entitlement so this trend is not going to change until health insurance starts being denied to people who create their own health problems through bad decisions. I also fully support firing and not hiring fat people. Why would I hire someone who has no self control or self respect with potential health problems to drive up my cost of insurance not to mention missed work. Simply does not compute.
 
Just eat less. It's incredibly simple but people just love their food. People eat like 4x what they need to satiate their hunger. They eat until they literally cannot cram any more food down their throat.

I know I love to eat and it's really tough not to fill my plate with my favorite meals and eat it all but if you dont have the willpower than dont whine about being fat.
 
I have a hard time boggling my mind with 3% of anything. The other way to state this is that 97% of the population is not morbidly obese down from 98% in 7 years.
 
Originally posted by: Linflas
I have a hard time boggling my mind with 3% of anything. The other way to state this is that 97% of the population is not morbidly obese down from 98% in 7 years.

heh, if you are not one already- you should be a stock broker or analyst
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
I also fully support firing and not hiring fat people. Why would I hire someone who has no self control or self respect with potential health problems to drive up my cost of insurance not to mention missed work. Simply does not compute.

Reminds me of a Norwegian guy on the Richard Dawkins forums that wanted to not hire Christians for tech support jobs because he didn't think it was possible for someone so irrational to be able to troubleshoot a computer.

Edit: True story. lol
 
Originally posted by: mrkun
Originally posted by: Ronstang
I also fully support firing and not hiring fat people. Why would I hire someone who has no self control or self respect with potential health problems to drive up my cost of insurance not to mention missed work. Simply does not compute.

Reminds me of a Norwegian guy on the Richard Dawkins forums that wanted to not hire Christians for tech support jobs because he didn't think it was possible for someone so irrational to be able to troubleshoot a computer.

Edit: True story. lol

His business, his call. I have no problem with that. I feel the same way about liberals. Why would I want to hire someone that uses flawed reasoning and flawed logic? Doesn't matter if they actually know how to do math or other technical things because not all decisions are made using a formula. Plus I am not going to provide a livelihood to someone that thinks that way. I think really religious people suffer from flawed reasoning an flawed logic at times but not quite as bad as liberals. At least many of them get the right answer using the wrong logic.
 
Originally posted by: mrkun
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: crt1530
Friendlier staircases and more walkable environments? How about personal responsibility for your own health? No environment is going to be "more walkable" if you eat so much that you are 100 pounds overweight.

Well, food is only half, if not less of the equation. It's the rise of a near or total lack of physical activity in our current society that correlates perfectly with the rise in obesity.

Actually, just the activity of walking does next to nothing for fat loss. I think walking for an hour probably burns fewer than 100 calories. Fat loss is primarily a matter of diet.

Wrong. Weight gain is cumulative, so any and all exercise is better than none.

Originally posted by: shadow9d9
You don't need to be active to be skinny. It is lack of willpower and self control. No amount of physical activity will help these people without willpower.

Wrong.


Proper physical exercise is key to good health, along with proper nutrition. You can't have one without the other.
Sure, you could become skinny through starving yourself, but you still won't be healthy (although you will be perhaps a bit more healthy than if you were morbidly obese and not exercising). However, it would be better to be a little fat AND exercising than to be skinny and NOT exercising.

People can do their usual simple-minded moronic (I expect no less from shadow9d9's underdeveloped mind) there-must-be-an-easy-solution-to-everything! stupidity but (as usual) it ain't so. Health is more than just a matter of weight, food intake, and willpower. It's about getting off your fat fscking ass, and living a complete healthy lifestyle.
 
Originally posted by: Linflas
I have a hard time boggling my mind with 3% of anything. The other way to state this is that 97% of the population is not morbidly obese down from 98% in 7 years.
Statistics mean nothing without proper presentation. 😉
 
Back
Top