Study: All net job growth in the U.S. since 1977 has been due to start-ups

Status
Not open for further replies.

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
There was a pretty interesting piece in the HBR blogs a few days ago that was written in response to President Obama's State of the Union speech - specifically, the part about job creation. The author takes note of how job creation in since 1977 has been entirely due to startups, but that the President's go-to crew for ideas on how to foster growth consists of all the wrong people for the job.

Harvard Business Review: Looking for Jobs in All the Wrong Places: Memo to the President

...

According to a recent study by the Kauffman Foundation, for example, all net job growth in the U.S. since 1977 has been due to start-ups. The data show that if you took start-ups out of the picture and looked only at large established firms, job growth in the U.S. over the last 34 years would actually be negative.

"When it comes to U.S. job growth," said Kauffman Foundation economist Tim Kane in his report, "start-up companies aren't everything. They're the only thing."

In your address last night, Mr. President, you correctly noted that, "The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation." Here, too, start-ups are the driving engine of our nation's global innovation leadership.

It is startups who have generated virtually all of our nation's major technological breakthroughs in the last hundred years — from cars and planes to semiconductors, PCs, software, and the Internet — and in the process sparked the creation of whole new industries and millions of new jobs. And as economists have demonstrated, this kind of start-up-led innovation is the source of virtually all economic growth and increases in living standards in the U.S.

In other words, Mr. President, everything depends upon start-ups: Job creation. Our standard of living. Our prosperity as a nation. The American Dream itself.

So if the target of national policy is job creation, then the bullseye of that policy must be centered on startups. Yet policy makers in both parties continue to aim at the wrong target.

Last month, Mr. President, you held a summit meeting with 20 of the nation's top CEOs to look for ways to spur job creation. But Fortune 100 CEOs are exactly the wrong people to talk to about jobs. Big Business is not a major job creator. Indeed, as one commentator put it, the guest list at this summit meeting represented "a who's who of outsourcing American jobs."
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Big business recycles jobs - stealing from each other

Small business creates the jobs, in very small steps a couple at a time.

Then the IRS trys to clamp down on the small business to make them jump through hoops that the big boys pay bean counters for :(
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,075
10,411
136
There was a pretty interesting piece in the HBR blogs a few days ago that was written in response to President Obama's State of the Union speech - specifically, the part about job creation. The author takes note of how job creation in since 1977 has been entirely due to startups, but that the President's go-to crew for ideas on how to foster growth consists of all the wrong people for the job.

Harvard Business Review: Looking for Jobs in All the Wrong Places: Memo to the President

Yes.. but if not for Fortune 100, where would the President get his economic advisers and treasury secretary? Silly Harvard Business Review. You mean, these men wish to enrich themselves? Say it isn't so! :eek: :hmm:

Perhaps if the President were willing to listen, he'd fire these men and women from his cabinet and staff immediately. Perhaps then he'd be a President for the people and not a President for the (big) business.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Yes.. but if not for Fortune 100, where would the President get his economic advisers and treasury secretary? Silly Harvard Business Review. You mean, these men wish to enrich themselves? Say it isn't so! :eek: :hmm:

Perhaps if the President were willing to listen, he'd fire these men and women from his cabinet and staff immediately. Perhaps then he'd be a President for the people and not a President for the (big) business.
WARNING: OVERSIMPLIFICATION AHEAD!

Democrats represent the poor and the very wealthy. Republicans represent the middle to lower upper class and the very wealthy. Either way, the wealthy will be taken care of by any government as large and powerful as ours. You simply cannot make a government this power and expect them not to make winners and losers - and wealthy people will expend money and influence to make sure they are the winners.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Looks like the Obama administration wasn't clueless on this issue - they've got plans in the works to target startups.

Are You Ready To Startup America?

Today at the White House, members of President Obama’s economic team and leading entrepreneurs are launching Startup America. As President Obama put it, Startup America is a “national campaign to help ‘win the future’ by knocking down barriers in the path of men and women in every corner of this country hoping to take a chance, follow a dream, and start a business.”

The White House is focused on entrepreneurship as a core element of the President’s innovation strategy because of the critical role that startups play in job creation in the United States. Startups are also responsible for developing many of the breakthrough products and services that will allow the United States to compete and win in the global economy – such as low-cost solar cells, new life-saving treatments for diseases, or the next breakthrough in wireless technology.

Answering the President’s call to action to invest in job-creating startups, leaders in the private sector launched the Startup America Partnership, an independent alliance to mobilize additional private sector commitments. Steve Case, co-founder of AOL and Chairman of the Case Foundation, will chair the Partnership, and Carl Schramm, President and CEO of the Kauffman Foundation will be a founding board member.

OSTP is incredibly excited about Startup America. Today is just the beginning of a sustained national effort. As the President noted, Startup America is an “historic partnership with business leaders, investors, universities, foundations, and non-profits, and we're urging others to join them in this effort.”

One of our goals in the months ahead is to create what Tim O’Reilly calls “an architecture of participation” that allows more people and organizations to get involved in Startup America.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
There was a pretty interesting piece in the HBR blogs a few days ago that was written in response to President Obama's State of the Union speech - specifically, the part about job creation. The author takes note of how job creation in since 1977 has been entirely due to startups, but that the President's go-to crew for ideas on how to foster growth consists of all the wrong people for the job.

Harvard Business Review: Looking for Jobs in All the Wrong Places: Memo to the President

Guess why? Since 1977, Social Security and Medicare taxes have killed Bigger businesses.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Maybe I glossed over it, but how on earth does that make any sense if large companies always start from nothing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.