• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Students can delay final exams over Michael Brown/Eric Garner

madoka

Diamond Member
Holy crap, this is genius! Delay my test or you're a racist!

If only I could use this to get out of work.

-----------------

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/12/08...s-postpone-exams-due-to-grand-jury-decisions/

Columbia University Law School is allowing its students to reschedule their exams if they feel traumatized by the recent grand jury decisions in the Eric Garner and Michael Brown cases.

The school’s interim dean, Robert E. Scott, notified students of the option in an email circulated to the student body on Saturday on the eve of the December exam period.

“The grand juries’ determinations to return non-indictments in the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases have shaken the faith of some in the integrity of the grand jury system and in the law more generally,” Mr. Scott’s letter said. “For some law students, particularly, though not only, students of color, this chain of events is all the more profound as it threatens to undermine a sense that the law is a fundamental pillar of society designed to protect fairness, due process and equality.”

As a result, “students who feel that their performance on examinations will be sufficiently impaired due to the effects of these recent events may petition [head of registration services] Dean Alice Rigas to have an examination rescheduled,” he wrote.

The school informed students of the policy amid protests in the city and other urban areas across America over the decisions by grand juries in New York City and Missouri not to indict white police officers involved in the deaths of two black men. The legal developments struck a nerve on the Ivy League campus located blocks away from Harlem. A number of Columbia students have joined the demonstrations. according to student newspaper reports.

Mr. Scott said the option to postpone a test was “in accordance” with the school’s existing examination policies. The school typically allows students to reschedule an exam because of an illness, religious observance, a death in the family, or other exceptional circumstances.
 
Murica!



I had to delete each of your final lebenty thousand exclamation points singly. I am wildly unhappy at this, but will limit the grammatical signification of my displeasure to but one!

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't need more than a 2nd motion for something. After someone seconds the motion, a vote is to take place...

I vote in the affirmative for action against Hugo!
 
I'm waiting for another pathetic news story. I just read the one about the Korean Air exec going full retard over being served nuts in a bag instead of a dish. Guess I'll add a couple more marks to the "Fuck humanity" list.
 
People are pissed off. They have a right to be pissed off. They are not giving away the answers or anything, they are just rescheduling the exam time. Its sort of like how deadlines constantly change in the workplace/reality. When the twin towers came crashing down in NY in 2001, they sent people home from the office if they were too upset to focus on their work...
 
People are pissed off. They have a right to be pissed off. They are not giving away the answers or anything, they are just rescheduling the exam time. Its sort of like how deadlines constantly change in the workplace/reality. When the twin towers came crashing down in NY in 2001, they sent people home from the office if they were too upset to focus on their work...

Reducing a terrorist attack on our soil that ended in the death of thousands to a piddling little racially motivated trial involving a shoplifter is one of the worst things I've ever read on these forums. I'm not sure if you said this as flamebait or what, but you certainly garnered a incredibly negative reaction from me.
 
People are pissed off. They have a right to be pissed off. They are not giving away the answers or anything, they are just rescheduling the exam time. Its sort of like how deadlines constantly change in the workplace/reality. When the twin towers came crashing down in NY in 2001, they sent people home from the office if they were too upset to focus on their work...

Can I have something rescheduled because I'm upset at all the morons protesting over a criminal being shot and cop being persecuted? Can we get something like that done? I'm upset.

I'd also like to point out, comparing the Michael Brown situation to a terrorist attack on America is....well....absolutely moronic to say the least.
 
Last edited:
Grumpy_Cat-Good.jpg
 
who cares? honestly if i was a law student i'd be pretty pissed off about those cases

come to think of it i'm not even a law student and i'm pretty pissed off

although i sure wish i could delay my probabilistic methods final next week...
 
You don't need more than a 2nd motion for something. After someone seconds the motion, a vote is to take place...

I vote in the affirmative for action against Hugo!

Thank you, Dr. Parliamentary Procedure 🙄😀.
 
Huh? So they'd rather the law students be able to continue operating with a delusional "sense that the law is a fundamental pillar of society designed to protect fairness, due process and equality" than have to shift their world view so that they accurately understand the law? Why would we want one of the more prestigious law schools to churn out lawyers who don't get how the law really works?
 
Can I have something rescheduled because I'm upset at all the morons protesting over a criminal being shot and cop being persecuted? Can we get something like that done? I'm upset.

I'd also like to point out, comparing the Michael Brown situation to a terrorist attack on America is....well....absolutely moronic to say the least.

Michael Brown is merely the straw that broke the camels back.

Only an idiot would narrow everything down in scope to just Michael Brown instead of looking at reality and seeing hundreds of cases of police brutality every year, or MANY cases of possible wrongful death every year. The Chokehold Death in NY, Chicago cop shooting kid with toy gun ...

This is a very big problem, it is not about one case of cop shoots criminal, its about how in poor neighborhoods the police act differently and treat people differently than in more expensive neighborhoods. Why are cops in nice suburban neighborhoods seen as friends to the people, but in poor neighborhoods, enemies of the people? Something is broken. And so what if somebody is guilty of petty crimes or even less petty of crimes, thats what the court is for. Cops are not judge dredd, the should not use deadly force unless they are in real danger of losing life or limb.
 
Reducing a terrorist attack on our soil that ended in the death of thousands to a piddling little racially motivated trial involving a shoplifter is one of the worst things I've ever read on these forums. I'm not sure if you said this as flamebait or what, but you certainly garnered a incredibly negative reaction from me.

Then please do not reduce this to piddling little ratially motivated trial and instead look at the big picture.

This is much bigger in scope, the death toll in this nation due to criminal/police confrontations over the last 200+ years adds up to a hell of a lot more than any terror attack.

Some are indeed justified, but many are questionable. It seems like standard operating procedures are different in the ghetto vs in nice suburban areas... Different levels of force applied to similar situations, why???
 
Back
Top