- Dec 7, 2013
- 3
- 0
- 0
I would like to build a powerful Office PC in the 500 to 1000 range that is silent (most of the time). Being a computer science student, "office" means programming and being able to do some cpu-expensive stuff. Before reading the Midrange Guide, I had some thoughts of my own, and they coincide with what is written there with subtle differences:
CPU: I changed my mind twice - from the 6600T to the 6600K. The extra 20 seem to be a fair trade-off for the flexibility and higher base clock.
Now the question is: will the CPU still be reasonably quiet?
GPU: I don't need one. I have a separate gaming PC and any multimedia tasks will be done there. I don't see the point of getting an entry-level one if the CPU can already deal with the loads?
And I like two-monitor setups. It should not be a problem to connect one to the HDMI and one to the DVI port, right? (while this is not extensible...)
MB, RAM: No difference here.
PSU: I am worried about the sound level of the PSU, so I had a look at the X-Series Fanless: http://www.seasonicusa.com/NEW_X-series_Fanless.htm
Is it worth the money or will a bequiet do the job as well?
Storage: I think I will get the Samsung 950 Pro. Given that I/O is often a limiting factor, I think it's worth it.
Is there a point of having three levels of storage speed (M.2 SSD, SATAe SSD, HDD) instead of two levels (M.2 SSD and HDD)? My feeling is that all the stuff that needs to be fast should fit into 256 GB and I am not quite ready to spend half of the PC budget on the 512 GB M.2 SSD. (Then again, the 850 Pro 512 GB is about 225 , so you end up paying the same...)
Case: I honestly don't know. Is there a point putting everything into a Mini ATX?
Or is all this just "too much"?
PS: A new gaming PC would be nice too. Hovewer, it looks like the CPU market is as alm as a millpond until the second half of 2016. Should we wait for AMD's Zen to bring Intel's prices down? (Should I open a new thread? Has this been discussed elsewhere?)
CPU: I changed my mind twice - from the 6600T to the 6600K. The extra 20 seem to be a fair trade-off for the flexibility and higher base clock.
Now the question is: will the CPU still be reasonably quiet?
GPU: I don't need one. I have a separate gaming PC and any multimedia tasks will be done there. I don't see the point of getting an entry-level one if the CPU can already deal with the loads?
And I like two-monitor setups. It should not be a problem to connect one to the HDMI and one to the DVI port, right? (while this is not extensible...)
MB, RAM: No difference here.
PSU: I am worried about the sound level of the PSU, so I had a look at the X-Series Fanless: http://www.seasonicusa.com/NEW_X-series_Fanless.htm
Is it worth the money or will a bequiet do the job as well?
Storage: I think I will get the Samsung 950 Pro. Given that I/O is often a limiting factor, I think it's worth it.
Is there a point of having three levels of storage speed (M.2 SSD, SATAe SSD, HDD) instead of two levels (M.2 SSD and HDD)? My feeling is that all the stuff that needs to be fast should fit into 256 GB and I am not quite ready to spend half of the PC budget on the 512 GB M.2 SSD. (Then again, the 850 Pro 512 GB is about 225 , so you end up paying the same...)
Case: I honestly don't know. Is there a point putting everything into a Mini ATX?
Or is all this just "too much"?
PS: A new gaming PC would be nice too. Hovewer, it looks like the CPU market is as alm as a millpond until the second half of 2016. Should we wait for AMD's Zen to bring Intel's prices down? (Should I open a new thread? Has this been discussed elsewhere?)
