Narratives drive voters, but hummm....
So, it's perfect time for someone who averaged a 1.6% GDP over his presidency, to claim credit for where we are now, right before the midterms. lol
Hate Trump all you want, as I do too, but history will set us straight on this and this economy will belong mostly to the orange baboon. If it is sustained, it's gonna make the puke look even better, in the history books.Yeah, I know it's an opinion. At the end of the term, we ask, are we better off than we were? We always ask ourselves that, after every president. We must find a way to tank the economy before the end of his term. I think California could do it best and should take the lead.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/28/opinion/trump-economy-credit.html
I don't see Obama claiming credit? Also, yes, absolutely a decent amount of a new President's time is going to be results based on the previous one's actions, especially economically. But ok, keep playing stupid, its certainly what you're good at.
Yeah Obama averaged that because he started in a ridiculous hole, thanks to Bush and Republicans' policies and handling of the economy and budget. Fact is, Obama absolutely put us in a better place than where we were when he started. Sure, it wouldn't have taken that much to accomplish that, but he put us in a much better place by being intelligent and actually, being fiscally conservative in many ways. You trying to mitigate the years of very healthy sustained growth by citing the average (which will be hurt because of where it started) is straight up bizarre, especially with your overall argument. You're trying to praise Turmp for "where it ends up" when we're not even 2 years into his Presidency? We know where we started when Obama took office, and we know where we ended up, and its objectively clear that it was in a much better spot.
Turmp started out in that spot, and he's maintained it by doing nothing and then giving a tax holiday that we have data showing what happens afterwards, especially when coupled with deregulation and other stuff that the Republicans also have been working to do. It leads back to that spot that Obama had to start with, or which sunk the first George Bush (because he was stupid enough to give a sound bite about "no new taxes" and then swallowed his political pride and did the smart thing and raised taxes because that's what was needed to get things working right again). Its not like people are just pissed because its Turmp or Republican. Its that Republicans are the ones that keep fucking doing that shit. Couple that with a multitude of completely valid criticisms about Turmp's economic policies (which seems to be slash and burn with regards to any and all deals that he didn't create - and seeing the types of deals he works with his business, we're gonna end up fucking bankrupt if he gets his way), and there's plenty of reasons to be outright pessimistic that Turmp will leave things in a better place.
I don't know if you and other conservatives realize how you almost constantly go out of your way to highlight the hypocrisy and idiocy of your arguments by undermining it yourself within your argument. I feel like I'm talking to aliens or something because its like you seem to believe that you're making this incredibly astute argument, only you just end up highlighting how incredibly asinine it is.
Oh, and let's not forget, Obama had tax cuts too. He just kept them for the lower income brackets while letting the ones for the highest ones end. So its not like its impossible to give tax cuts to the middle class and poor while still smartly playing the economy. So Obama kept massive tax cuts for most Americans, and in spite of the claim by Republicans that taxing the wealthy hurts the economy, the economy kept growing (and sustained it even).