amish
Diamond Member
- Aug 20, 2004
- 4,295
- 6
- 81
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
So did the planes take off from a conveyor belt or what?
STFU, malibooo...
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
So did the planes take off from a conveyor belt or what?
Originally posted by: amish
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
So did the planes take off from a conveyor belt or what?
STFU, malibooo...
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
This thread is pure entertainment.
I'm tempted to put links to 9/11 conspiracies in my sig just to see if it pushes him over the edge.
LOLOriginally posted by: scott
Maybe the executives of both Rolls Royce and Pratt & Whitney who stated the little engine bit recovered was not from a jetliner engine nor jetliner APU don't know their business.
Off to P&N with you.
readOriginally posted by: scott
Maybe the executives of both Rolls Royce and Pratt & Whitney who stated the little engine bit recovered was not from a jetliner engine nor jetliner APU don't know their business.
Off to P&N with you.
Originally posted by: Jinru
I know this has been beaten to death already, but has anyone seen this video yet? I just watched it a few days ago and thought it was very well done compared to Loose Change. The video only concentrates on the WTC buildings and the connections between people in power.
Originally posted by: QueBert
I don't believe for half a second a full sized commercial jet was what crashed into the Pentagon, too bad an image of what it was didn't pop up on Google Maps. I know they have something like a 2 year delay on the images they relay. I would have loved to have seen those.
Oh god no, he's awakened from his slumber!Originally posted by: MasonLuke
Originally posted by: montypythizzle
So did the planes take off from a conveyor belt or what?
NO
Originally posted by: dug777
Everyone knows it was a conspiracy.
It makes so much more sense than some terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings.
A bit like the JFK assassination. There's no way he could have been killed by a single, possibly mentally unstable, man. It must have been a vast and involved conspiracy.
There's just no other answer you can validly come to, i'm afraid.
Originally posted by: QueBert
Originally posted by: dug777
Everyone knows it was a conspiracy.
It makes so much more sense than some terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings.
A bit like the JFK assassination. There's no way he could have been killed by a single, possibly mentally unstable, man. It must have been a vast and involved conspiracy.
There's just no other answer you can validly come to, i'm afraid.
110 stories fell in 8.4 seconds, planes alone didn't do that, if stating the obvious means I should be wearing a Tin Foil hat. Then fine I'll go make one and put it on
Originally posted by: DrPizza
In response to the arguments that it fell as fast as free-fall - you're right! It *IS* a government conspiracy. They have a super-gravity machine that was used to accelerate debris that broke off the building at a greater rate so that it would fall faster than the building. /sarcasm
Watch a video of the collapse again. Note the debris raining down - it falls faster than the building. Now... tell me again, your calculations show that the building accelerated as fast as free-fall? Either your calculations are wrong, you timed it wrong, or the government really does have a super-gravity machine. Probably the middle problem.