Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: Deeko
No bigdog, read the subtitle of this thread, you're wrong. You will be wrong no matter what you say in this thread, too.
Bonds is good without steroids. But you know what? He still has massive advantages that Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron never had. It doesn't matter if he does steroids or not, he has an advantage over previous athletes. Legal or not, he uses enhancements. Am I saying that its right to use steroids? Nah, but many many many of them still do, and they keep getting better and better, and so do the legal ones. Fact of the matter is, record books ARENT sacred and fair, and they wont be.
You steroid monkeys are whining for all the wrong reasons. You aren't complaining that he's hurting himself. You aren't complaining about the risks of steroids, you are whining about your precious record books, WHICH ARE TAINTED NO MATTER WHAT.
There. I'm right, you're wrong, you can try to argue, but you're still wrong.
jesus, are you really that arrogant? of course every record will one day be broken. i just expect it to be on the up and up, without shooting sh!t into their arms, or a shake, or a pill.
but im the asshole for expecting these athletes to at least be honest about their performance? get a clue.
edit: the only reason the books are tainted is because training is different than it used to be. back then, players didnt spend 8hrs a day working out. they spent that time drinking and womanizing.
Steroids are not shot into the arm or into a vein