• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Stitching photos together?

BigLar

Senior member
I'm scanning several pictures, many of which are larger than the bed of my scanner (Epson V30). I'm running Vista Home premium. Can anybody recommend a program to stitch together multiple partial scans of large images?

I'd like good fidelity as these are heirloom images.

Thanks!!!
 
Last edited:
One thing to note with Autostitch: since it is a "demo" version of AutoPano Pro, it is somewhat limited in features, and the default settings are very lame. Before you do any photo stitching, first click on the Edit>Options menu and change the following options or you will get very low quality results:

Scale %: 100%
System Memory (GB): 1 (or more, if your computer has 2GB RAM or more)
JPEG Quality: 100

After you save the settings, click File>Open and then browse to the images that you want to stitch. One major difference between Autostitch and AutoPano is that with Autostitch you need to manually select the images that you want to stitch together and can only do one panorama/stitch at a time. If you do happen to select an image that won't link up with any others in the group it will usually just drop that image, but it can sometimes get confused if you give it somewhat similar images that don't belong. With AutoPano Pro, you can select an entire directory (or your entire hard drive) and it will automatically sort through all of the pictures and use a series of algorithms to separate them into individual stitching groups. If you really do have 10,000 images to stitch, it might be worth the extra cost, but that's up to you.

Also, you will need to use a separate image editor like GIMP or Photoshop to crop off the "extra" border area from the images produced by Autostitch while you can do it directly within AutoPano pro.

Please don't think that I'm trying to talk you into spending money on AutoPano pro if you really don't want to (I don't have any affiliation with them, but I really like the program), but it sounds like you might be in a position where it would be a worthwhile purchase. I would definitely try out Autostitch first and see how it works for you, since only you can decide if you are willing to work within the limitations of the free program for your project or if spending 99 Euro (about $150 US) is worth making the job a lot easier and faster with that many images.



edit: I forgot to mention something important that will make your life a lot easier with this project. While you are scanning the images, try to overlap the edges of each successive scan a little bit (at least 10%, but 25% is better) so that the program has enough matching data to work with that it can use to stitch the images together.
 
Last edited:
I stitched a few documents that were on large sheets of paper last night and found it worked very well. I hadn't "upgraded" the settings as you had suggested, but will do so before working with photos.

This seems to be quite a nice program, so I can see that your enthusiasm is well justified. Thanks for the tips and all the help.
 
For stitching together scanned images, autostitch may not do all that great of a job. It is designed for rotating panoramas (that is, rotating a camera on a tripod or something like that).
I would try Microsoft ICE for scanned images, its free and does a very good job with it. It offers some control over how the individual images can be manipulated (whether they can be rotated or not, skewed, etc). Oh, and while I'm not sure about autostitch, I know ICE has some command line capabilities that might make your 10,000 images easier to batch.

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ice/
 
Back
Top