• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Steam on OS X?

This should be interesting. I've never ever thought of macs as capable gaming machines, but who knows. If they do it and for some strange reason it causes problems for the PC aspect, I'd be annoyed. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
for what? like 5 games?

somehow those dolts on kotaku think that a steam client for mac means that all games will be available on mac too.
 
Inspector Jihad said:
for what? like 5 games?

somehow those dolts on kotaku think that a steam client for mac means that all games will be available on mac too.
Click to expand...

There's some speculation that the source engine is going to be ported.

Now, if this is true and you get a couple of the half-lifes and other source games on the mac, then gaming will probably pick up a little.
 
Actually its kinda smart. Limited shelf space and a small user base means marketing OSX games in brick and mortar stores is an expensive proposition. However, if developers can bypass the stores, Steam can offer a greater profit margin, even if the amount of available games is limited. They can also sell OSX games that aren't in stores anymore, thus squeezing additional profit out of them. This could also stir up some Indie developer support if they have an avenue for distribution.

It won't bring any real competition to PC gaming, but for Apple users who want a few more options than what the stores offer it's a great thing. Kudos to Valve/Steam
 
sourceninja said:
They could start using cider to "port" a large amount of steam games to osx.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's more of a job for the game devs rather than the Steam devs. I can't see most devs letting anyone let Valve look at their code let alone muck around with it.
 
MStele said:
Actually its kinda smart. Limited shelf space and a small user base means marketing OSX games in brick and mortar stores is an expensive proposition. However, if developers can bypass the stores, Steam can offer a greater profit margin, even if the amount of available games is limited. They can also sell OSX games that aren't in stores anymore, thus squeezing additional profit out of them. This could also stir up some Indie developer support if they have an avenue for distribution.

It won't bring any real competition to PC gaming, but for Apple users who want a few more options than what the stores offer it's a great thing. Kudos to Valve/Steam
Click to expand...

This.

You take all of the cost advantages of digital distribution in the PC games market and multiply them by a large factor because the Mac games market is that much smaller.

Also, the average GPU in a Mac is far superior to the average PC GPU, esp. in recent years because of Apple's focus on OpenCL.
 
mfenn said:
This.

You take all of the cost advantages of digital distribution in the PC games market and multiply them by a large factor because the Mac games market is that much smaller.

Also, the average GPU in a Mac is far superior to the average PC GPU, esp. in recent years because of Apple's focus on OpenCL.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't go that far.

You have quite a bit more flexibility with a PC in being able to choose your GPU.

As far as laptops go, there's really only two options: The 9400m and 9600gt. The 9400m performs admirably in anything that's 3 years old or older and some newer games. It's ok for integrated, and it's a lot better than Intel's offerings for sure.

The 9600gt is a pretty nice GPU and can play most games on the market with respectable settings. That said, it's no powerhouse either.

(I'm leaving out the iMac's GPU because I'm not that familiar with it)
 
mfenn said:
This.

You take all of the cost advantages of digital distribution in the PC games market and multiply them by a large factor because the Mac games market is that much smaller.

Also, the average GPU in a Mac is far superior to the average PC GPU, esp. in recent years because of Apple's focus on OpenCL.
Click to expand...

With the exception of the Mac Pro, the entire mac lineup is based off their mobile chipset. They all use integrated graphics (except the Mac Pro. Superior is hardly what I would call it lmao.
 
MStele said:
With the exception of the Mac Pro, the entire mac lineup is based off their mobile chipset. They all use integrated graphics (except the Mac Pro. Superior is hardly what I would call it lmao.
Click to expand...

The 2nd level and above Macbook Pros (15-17") and iMacs have dedicated graphics. Not replaceable GPUs but they are definitely not integrated nVidia or ATI GPUs
 
Remember apple bought up all those 4000 series gpus from ati a few months ago? I could see apple using some of that 40 billion they have on hand to start a gaming initiative. If they subsidize development or the porting of some high visibility titles they could do very well.

Just so they can take the you cant game on a mac argument away....
 
MStele said:
With the exception of the Mac Pro, the entire mac lineup is based off their mobile chipset. They all use integrated graphics (except the Mac Pro. Superior is hardly what I would call it lmao.
Click to expand...

Aha! You (and others) have been caught in my trap.

Remember, the VAST majority of PCs sold today have Intel integrated graphics. The 9400M far superior to those chips (ie. it can actually play games), giving the Mac platform an installed base of competent GPUs. Not great GPUs, but competent. Sure, the Mac is only like 10% of the US market, but every single one of those sold in the past 18mos has a competent GPU. That's where Valve can make some money.
 
Last edited:
manimal said:
Remember apple bought up all those 4000 series gpus from ati a few months ago? I could see apple using some of that 40 billion they have on hand to start a gaming initiative. If they subsidize development or the porting of some high visibility titles they could do very well.

Just so they can take the you cant game on a mac argument away....
Click to expand...

Nope, Apple detests the gaming market. Steve Jobs' vision is a place where computers empower ordinary people to do things they couldn't before. He doesn't like people wasting time playing video games. I recall there was a quote from him about he was disappointed the iPod touch had become such a large gaming platform.
 
tokie said:
Nope, Apple detests the gaming market. Steve Jobs' vision is a place where computers empower ordinary people to do things they couldn't before. He doesn't like people wasting time playing video games. I recall there was a quote from him about he was disappointed the iPod touch had become such a large gaming platform.
Click to expand...

what a pretentious asshole.
 
Inspector Jihad said:
what a pretentious asshole.
Click to expand...

Yeah, fuck Jobs. The Mac is a good platform though, especially for sys admins. You get the flexibility of UNIX, but everything is nicely optimized for battery life (unlike Linux 🙁 ).

I'm just happy that I will soon be able to install Steam directly on my Macbook and utilize the 1GBps connection at work (I work for a university) to download games. Currently I use a Windows VM to download the games and then back them up to my gaming box. The VM is kind of a PITA though, and it'll be nice to be able to dump it.
 
mfenn said:
Aha! You (and others) have been caught in my trap.

Remember, the VAST majority of PCs sold today have Intel integrated graphics. The 9400M far superior to those chips (ie. it can actually play games), giving the Mac platform an installed base of competent GPUs. Not great GPUs, but competent. Sure, the Mac is only like 10% of the US market, but every single one of those sold in the past 18mos has a competent GPU. That's where Valve can make some money.
Click to expand...

Not really.

Most people who game on a PC, don't do it on a laptop with Intel Integrated Graphics. The vast majority who play the demanding games that require GPU horsepower will do it on a desktop where they have the flexibility to choose whatever video card they want.

I see what you're saying though. Apple has a line up of computers that have all the same baseline components. That said, most people who buy Apples (including myself) didn't buy them to play games.
 
fatpat268 said:
Not really.

Most people who game on a PC, don't do it on a laptop with Intel Integrated Graphics. The vast majority who play the demanding games that require GPU horsepower will do it on a desktop where they have the flexibility to choose whatever video card they want.

I see what you're saying though. Apple has a line up of computers that have all the same baseline components. That said, most people who buy Apples (including myself) didn't buy them to play games.
Click to expand...

Gamers aside, a lot of computers still come with subpar integrated graphics, many more than there are gaming systems out there. I mean, how many laptops with decent graphics do you think sold last year? Now, how many netbooks? Which had better graphics?

If I am gaming, I am doing it on my desktop, which even if it doesn't have a great, current gen GPU, still games well. But, it is also my hackintosh, if I could play some more games without rebooting... I will.
 
Last edited:
MStele said:
Actually its kinda smart. Limited shelf space and a small user base means marketing OSX games in brick and mortar stores is an expensive proposition. However, if developers can bypass the stores, Steam can offer a greater profit margin, even if the amount of available games is limited. They can also sell OSX games that aren't in stores anymore, thus squeezing additional profit out of them. This could also stir up some Indie developer support if they have an avenue for distribution.

It won't bring any real competition to PC gaming, but for Apple users who want a few more options than what the stores offer it's a great thing. Kudos to Valve/Steam
Click to expand...

What graphics library would these OS X steam games use?
 
Last edited:
tokie said:
Nope, Apple detests the gaming market. Steve Jobs' vision is a place where computers empower ordinary people to do things they couldn't before. He doesn't like people wasting time playing video games. I recall there was a quote from him about he was disappointed the iPod touch had become such a large gaming platform.
Click to expand...

These days it seems GPU technology is moving at such a fast rate though.

I'm sure some type of productive simulation (Farming, Alternative energy) could be produced that might have *some* game-like and puzzle-like qualities.

There are so many different ways a person, group or organization can accomplish a task. Why not include all these different variables in a format that makes learning and accomplishing an objective fun?
 
tokie said:
Nope, Apple detests the gaming market. Steve Jobs' vision is a place where computers empower ordinary people to do things they couldn't before. He doesn't like people wasting time playing video games. I recall there was a quote from him about he was disappointed the iPod touch had become such a large gaming platform.
Click to expand...

While Jobs openly dislikes the gaming market if there is money to be made they will make it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top