- Jun 20, 2009
- 2,428
- 0
- 71
So I used to be a big Xboxer back when I was a complete fool and payed out the nose for multiplayer. I still love the Xbox 360 controller and I play ALL of my games with it. I don't mean to offend anyone or start a flame war. I know that a lot of people think gamepads are inferior to Keyboard and Mouse and use them with great skill as well, but they don't seem to give me a problem as I am normally top of the charts in most of the lobbies I'm in. In the last two days I've purchased Batman: AA and Metro 2033. Both games are EXCELLENT and both are controller enabled plug n' play style (while working pristinely), which I love. The thing is I was worried because neither are labeled as such. I normally use an application called XPadder when a game doesn't have controller support built in, but it doesn't always work the best because of either slowness or fastness of the sensitivity.
As for the games on steam that are labeled "Controller Enabled", some of them suck. I bought Battlefront II durring a steam sale and it only works if you program every function individually for every single method of travel (walking, hero, land vehicle, flying vehicle, turret) which took about 30 min. only to find out the analog sticks were really f'ed up.
So why do you think steam labels some games that barely have controller functionality "controller enabled" while leaving the best games with the best controller functionality out of the mix?
As for the games on steam that are labeled "Controller Enabled", some of them suck. I bought Battlefront II durring a steam sale and it only works if you program every function individually for every single method of travel (walking, hero, land vehicle, flying vehicle, turret) which took about 30 min. only to find out the analog sticks were really f'ed up.
So why do you think steam labels some games that barely have controller functionality "controller enabled" while leaving the best games with the best controller functionality out of the mix?