thirtythree
Diamond Member
These questions are bugging me. I'm supposed to tell what is wrong with what these statements but I can't even figure out what they are trying to say.
A study reports statistically significant results (p=.001, df=0) after doing a one sample t-test for the proportion of the population.
First of all, I thought you were supposed to use a z-test for proportions. And can you have df=0? If so that would mean the sample size was 1 which wouldn't pass the np>=10 and n(1-p)>=10 tests for using proportions anyway. 😕
2. A student searched the Internet for data on a project. He found a file with the population of each of the states of the USA. He used a calculator to construct a 95% confidence interval for the means of the population.
I don't understand what he is doing here. Creating a C.I. for the mean population of a state? What would be the problem with that? It would be kinda pointless since he knows the pop. of all the states but is there anything wrong with doing it?
A study reports statistically significant results (p=.001, df=0) after doing a one sample t-test for the proportion of the population.
First of all, I thought you were supposed to use a z-test for proportions. And can you have df=0? If so that would mean the sample size was 1 which wouldn't pass the np>=10 and n(1-p)>=10 tests for using proportions anyway. 😕
2. A student searched the Internet for data on a project. He found a file with the population of each of the states of the USA. He used a calculator to construct a 95% confidence interval for the means of the population.
I don't understand what he is doing here. Creating a C.I. for the mean population of a state? What would be the problem with that? It would be kinda pointless since he knows the pop. of all the states but is there anything wrong with doing it?