• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Statistics Help: Does increasing N reduce the risk of making a Type I error?

webnewland

Golden Member
Type 1 error: Rejecting the hypothesis incorrectly

so does increasing N reduce the risk of making a Type I error? I'm thinking the alpha level we set (normally .05) is the same no matter how many N we use, so the more leptokurtotic graph still have .05 chance of getting type I error? Is this incorrect?
Thanks
 
yup, so I thought if we decide alpha level at the very beginning, no matter how many N we test, our chance of rejecting incorrectly will always be the alpha level. But many of my friends seem to say that increasing N will reduced the risk of making a Type I error.
 
Err..doesn't alpha itself distinguish the percent chance of making a Type I error?
If alpha = .05 = 5% chance of Type I error, right?
 
Back
Top