• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

State of QoS with standard routers

Netscape

Junior Member
Hi there!

I'm currently using an older TP-Link router (TL-WR1043ND) and am not satisfied with its bandwidth control / QoS feature.

What I would like to do is, give an IP a high priority, so that its traffic is always preferred over other connected clients.

I'm somewhat able to achieve this with my current router when I set the minimum download bandwidth of that IP to the maximum bandwidth I have specified for the WAN connection but the problem is, that the maximum download speed will be reduced for all other clients without any logic reason. When I enter higher maximum speeds for the WAN connection, this won't happen, but the IP that I would like to prioritise somehow doesn't receive the proper attention anymore.

So my question: whats your impression on QoS with the current router generation. Can you prioritize clients traffic without drawbacks (and with fairly easy setup, since I'm not deep into the networking game)?
 
No. QoS on basically any/all consumer routers is going to result in a reduction of the maximum attainable bandwidth to the internet. Figure if you have QoS or bandwidth management enable you are likely to lose somewhere between 5-15% total bandwidth.

There are routers with better bandwidth management/QoS than the 1043nd, just expect you are still going to have some "shaved off the top" if you have it enabled on any consumer router.
 
Back
Top