Starcraft 2 - I am dissappoint!

[DVad3r]

Hey guys, I was away on vacation but just catching up on all the latest and greatest. I just finished beating Starcraft 2 campaign and it was amazing. Multiplayer though is a big fail for me.

Why?

Here are 3 reasons:

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Not having hero's like WC3 is complete fail, and I can't get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed since SC?

Thoughts? Opinions?

I realize this game still appeals to the mass crazy hardcore RTS crowd...but there is just, something missing...

Wrong forum but there are already threads about it in PC Gaming.
Admin allisolm

 

[Ika]

starcraft was the perfect RTS, they had to live up to these expectations. therefore they couldn't change it very much. personally i think they've done a fairly good job recreating a fresh starcraft experience.

also wrong forum

 

[PieIsAwesome]

Starcraft 2 multiplayer is great. Here are 3 reasons:

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Having heroes like WC3 is complete fail, and I can get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed fundamentally since SC.

 

[gorcorps]

There are a boatload of threads to use in the right forum

Nobody cares about your bullshit here

 

[DVad3r]

starcraft was the perfect RTS, they had to live up to these expectations. therefore they couldn't change it very much. personally i think they've done a fairly good job recreating a fresh starcraft experience.

also wrong forum

I don't know, WC3 was pretty big also, and the addition of heroes made the game. Now it's just a mass amount of units going into the fodder. Unless I am retarded, but where are the firebats, the medics?

 

[Ns1]

Starcraft 2 multiplayer is great. Here are 3 reasons:

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Having heroes like WC3 is complete fail, and I can get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed fundamentally since SC.

thread winner

 

[DVad3r]

There are a boatload of threads to use in the right forum

Nobody cares about your bullshit here

Yo shut up peon, back to your burrow you go.

 

[Anubis]

1) to balance all that would take another 12 years
2) heroes suck
3) not sure what the prob is here

 

[Newbian]

Heroes like WC3 had was what sucked for it for me and many other people.

 

[Alone]

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Not having hero's like WC3 is complete fail, and I can't get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed since SC?

That's why I like it and the original.

 

[irishScott]

I like it. They took away unit group limits so I don't have to micro as much. That was my only real complaint about the original. The new units in SC2 also kick ass.

 

[ravana]

I miss in the Firebats in Multiplayer, but the Banshee more than makes up for that.

 

[MJinZ]

Hey guys, I was away on vacation but just catching up on all the latest and greatest. I just finished beating Starcraft 2 campaign and it was amazing. Multiplayer though is a big fail for me.

Why?

Here are 3 reasons:

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Not having hero's like WC3 is complete fail, and I can't get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed since SC?

Thoughts? Opinions?

I realize this game still appeals to the mass crazy hardcore RTS crowd...but there is just, something missing...

You mean the 2 expansion packs already being anxiously anticipated that will undoubtedly add both features and units.

 

[KeithTalent]

I found the game boring, but there are multiple threads in the proper forum where you can discuss this.

KT

 

[mb]

I found the game boring, but there are multiple threads in the proper forum where you can discuss this.

KT

Yeah but you keep locking them!!!

 

[rcpratt]

Heroes were fail. Multiplayer is fine. The campaign was great obviously.

 

[KeithTalent]

Yeah but you keep locking them!!!

Only the redundant threads. It's not OT, we do not need a thread for every little brain fart related to one game.

KT

 

[BlahBlahYouToo]

Yeah but you keep locking them!!!

sheeit, he locked me and gave me an infraction.

 

[mb]

Only the redundant threads. It's not OT, we do not need a thread for every little brain fart related to one game.

KT

I know, I know, hence the

 

[Newbian]

sheeit, he locked me and gave me an infraction.

Well that's what you get for not giving out a reach around.

 

[DVad3r]

Wow, I can't believe that you guys didn't like the heroes of WC3! like omg /wrist!

But yea, now I guess I will have to wait for more expansions, and the ultimate game, Diablo 3.

 

[preslove]

Hey guys, I was away on vacation but just catching up on all the latest and greatest. I just finished beating Starcraft 2 campaign and it was amazing. Multiplayer though is a big fail for me.

Why?

Here are 3 reasons:

1. You don't get half the units/abilities/mercs etc that you get in the campaign.

2. Not having hero's like WC3 is complete fail, and I can't get used to an RTS without them.

3. Not much has changed since SC?

Thoughts? Opinions?

I realize this game still appeals to the mass crazy hardcore RTS crowd...but there is just, something missing...

I'm going to go ahead and cross-post from the Haiku thread:

poster above me
is a douche bag and nozzle
all of us know this.

 

[LucJoe]

I miss in the Firebats in Multiplayer, but the Banshee more than makes up for that.

Hellions = Fast firebats

 

[DVad3r]

Hellions = Fast firebats

Yea I guess, but those can't be healed? Why not give player a choice between explorer/raven? Explorer owns

 

[KeithTalent]

I know, I know, hence the

Sorry man, just sick of getting grief from everyone.

KT