Originally posted by: randay
Q would fvcken school Darth Vader like a fat bald 13 year old retarded kid.
Originally posted by: FoBoT
BTW, a single round house kick from Chuck Norris > *
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Star Destroyers have lasers. As per one ST: TNG episodes, lasers wouldn't even be able to get through the navigational deflector shields.
But hey, these are stronger lasers. Maybe they'd make it through to the main deflectors, but otherwise they wouldn't pose much threat.
Meanwhile, 1 nice photon/quantum torpedo to the bridge or reactor of the Star Destroyer, and it is eliminated as a threat.
TIE Fighters......yeah right. They'd be a mere nuisance if all they did was make suicide runs into the Starfleet ship's shields.
Most powerful ships in Starfleet? I guess that'd either be a Defiant, Prometheus, or Sovereign-class. Any of them would be able to disable the Executor in pretty short order.
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Death Star, FTW. It blows up planets, so there sure as hell is no ship in either universe that could withstand a hit from it.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Death Star, FTW. It blows up planets, so there sure as hell is no ship in either universe that could withstand a hit from it.
Again 8472 Bioships did blow up planets.
Also, the Death Star wouldn't be able to move at even sublight speeds. The amount of power required to move the thing would be akin to the energy generated by a star.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: randay
Q would fvcken school Darth Vader like a fat bald 13 year old retarded kid.
Young Vader or old Vader?
Originally posted by: So
We had a thread about this with many hundreds of posts...look, the Executor was more than 34 times as long ans the enterprise and had tens of thousands of times the internal volume. HTF do you think it could destroy something that big? In the star trek, universe, they'd have trouble destroying a ROCK that big, if it came to a heavily fortified armored and shielded ship....no chance. A simple consideration of the energy on hand in the SSD's reactors to power all those weapons shows it's annhilate the enterprise.
They are two different universes, deal w/ it.
Major technical blunder there though.One item is how a ship in Star Wars could quickly travel across the entire galaxy, while in Star Trek it still takes quiet a while even for the Borg.
Originally posted by: Horus
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Death Star, FTW. It blows up planets, so there sure as hell is no ship in either universe that could withstand a hit from it.
Except, y'know, a single snubfighter with an proton torpedo.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: randay
Q would fvcken school Darth Vader like a fat bald 13 year old retarded kid.
Young Vader or old Vader?
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
It wouldn't matter which Vader...Q would pwn all!
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
It wouldn't matter which Vader...Q would pwn all!
He could do just just with witty commentary.
"Nice ship, Vader. Compensating for something that was burned off a long time ago, eh?"
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
so how is a star destroyer going to resist a photon torpedo (which is a mass with a velocity of C, giving it a KE of 1/2 M C^2)?![]()
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: So
We had a thread about this with many hundreds of posts...look, the Executor was more than 34 times as long ans the enterprise and had tens of thousands of times the internal volume. HTF do you think it could destroy something that big? In the star trek, universe, they'd have trouble destroying a ROCK that big, if it came to a heavily fortified armored and shielded ship....no chance. A simple consideration of the energy on hand in the SSD's reactors to power all those weapons shows it's annhilate the enterprise.
They are two different universes, deal w/ it.
Destroy? No, that'd take awhile, like the fighter jets in Independence Day picking away at a huge alien ship with missiles. But to disable it - that's easy. A single A-wing kamikazed into the bridge of the Executor, and it lost control. I think 1 photon torpedo would do far more damage than that, like take out the entire bridge completely. We got to see the damage potential of a small fighter in Empire Strikes Back, when a snowspeeder crashed into the ground. Small fireball = not a lot of damage. 1 photon torpedo = big damn explosion, like about an area of 1/4 that of 1 side of a Borg cube (from the episode with Enterprise-D's first encounter with the Borg).
Or target the power reactor instead. Call in a couple of freighters to tow the Executor on a collision course with a planet or star, and it won't be able to do anything about it with no bridge or primary power source.
Major technical blunder there though.One item is how a ship in Star Wars could quickly travel across the entire galaxy, while in Star Trek it still takes quiet a while even for the Borg.
"If they did go into light speed they could be on the other side of the galaxy by now."
They said it there. Light speed. Here, light speed gets you across the galaxy in more than 100,000 years. There, either they've got one damn tiny galaxy, or else, in accordance with my Wattage Inflation and Skewed Physics theories, Light Speed gives you more bang for the buck.
Originally posted by: Horus
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Death Star, FTW. It blows up planets, so there sure as hell is no ship in either universe that could withstand a hit from it.
Except, y'know, a single snubfighter with an proton torpedo.
Defiant casually maneuvers in, picking off TIE Fighters just for the hell of it, fires one torpedo, and saunters away to a safe distance to enjoy the scenery.
Just to be asses though, as the Defiant flies down the trench, they'd just quick stop and watch Vader's TIE smash into the rear shields. Poof.
Ok, time for new threads:
Yoda vs Sauron
Gollum vs Jar Jar Binks vs Dobby
C-3PO vs Hitchiker's Guide Marvin
Harry Potter vs Gandalf
Q vs anyone
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Darth Vadar would just choke hold the crew of nerds on any Trekkie ship.
Originally posted by: Horus
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Death Star, FTW. It blows up planets, so there sure as hell is no ship in either universe that could withstand a hit from it.
Except, y'know, a single snubfighter with an proton torpedo.
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Yoda > Sauron. All he'd have to do is use the force to rip off the ring and fling it into Mt Doom. If it's before Sauron creates the ring, then I think he might have more of a shot.
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
so how is a star destroyer going to resist a photon torpedo (which is a mass with a velocity of C, giving it a KE of 1/2 M C^2)?![]()
Because the load of 1 pgoton torpedo is still a pop gun compared to a SSD.
That's about the ONLY wizardy thing Gandalf did. Come on, what's the other great stuff he did?Gandalf >> Harry Potter. C'mon, a Balrog couldn't even kill him.
Borg find Darth Vader.Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Darth Vader vs The Borg
Darth Vader wins EVERY TIME
Jedi are good sports. You wouldn't even need to do anything as big as ripping the heart out. Just squeeze an artery there or in the person's brain. Heart attack or stroke FTW.Oh come on, if you could use the force to affect the other person directly, why didn't Yoda just rip out his enemy's heart at the start of every battle?
As much as I love Gollum/Smeagol, I think Dobby would have the edge. Gollum's big on Crazy HP, but Dobby's got the Magic option.Gollum > Dobby > Jar Jar. He's wiry.
You're right, if the enterprise gets a 1 in a million lucky shot, after flying slowly through a weaker portion of the shield and skimming along the dorsal surface of the ship which is studded with anti fighter turbolasers that might well vaporize the ship in one hit.Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: So
Because the load of 1 pgoton torpedo is still a pop gun compared to a SSD.
But again, the collision of an A-wing into the bridge of the Executor was enough to disable it. Photon torpedo or quantum torpedo has a far greater yield than that.
