SSE2 makes Opterons slower than Athlon XPs

miken

Senior member
Mar 22, 2000
710
0
0
One persons findings doesn't make it true, especially with Sisoft Sandra.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
But it's not all bad news for the Opteron. He said that well known Japanese archiving software GCA (http://www.emit.jp/gca/gca.html) compresses WAV files a staggering 50% faster than P4-2.8GHz, equivalent to a Pentium 4.4GHz chip, if such a beast existed.

Wow all japanese software. Yeah one persons findings dont mean anything.
 

godmare

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2002
5,121
0
0
Seems to me that testing (and judging) the Opteron as a workstation processor is a bit premature, on top of using 32-bit software. Athlon64, while still a 64-bit chip will undoubtedly be optimized for orkstations, having all the wrinkles of the Opteron ironed out.
 

Diable

Senior member
Sep 28, 2001
753
0
0
He told the INQUIRER that he measured the execution time to encode DV-format AVI files to MPEG, WMV, Divx and Xvid. He found that for encoding DivX and Xvid, Opteron 242's performance is roughly equivalent to a Pentium 4-2.8GHz, which matches the expectation from SPEC int/fp results.

This guys numbers seem funny, I've never seen a AMD processor (of any kind) hang with a P4 in Divx/Xvid encoding. In Anand's tests a 1.8GHz Opteron did 69.5fps when encoding using Divx5 (link) and a 2.8GHz P4 did 80.5fps (link).
 

imgod2u

Senior member
Sep 16, 2000
993
0
0
What I'm curious about is whether this is an Opteron-specific issue. Did he try disabling SSE2 on the P4 and seeing how well it ran with MMX? Perhaps SSE2 is just not good at integer math. It is a floating point extension after all......
 

imgod2u

Senior member
Sep 16, 2000
993
0
0
Yes, but the specific program he's refering to has two sets of code, one that uses SSE2 and one that only uses MMX. He was able to disable the usage of SSE2 for the Opteron and use MMX instead.