• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

SSD shopping, but my board is Sata 2.

I am looking in to getting an SSD for my EVGA X58 SLI mother board.
My goal is getting the best 200GB SSD for my money, with a budget of
about 200-ish dollars. My problem is that my listed mother board only
supports sata 2.

My first set of concerns; Sata 2 vs 3.
I could do a sata 3 controller card with a sata 3 SSD. That would
probably cost the most but it would probably simplify the equation. If
the jump in performance is really drastic, then i might bump up my
budget.
Or, should i just buy the best sata 2 SSD? Is there an advantageous
trade off in terms of reliability and larger sizes for lower prices if
i just buy Sata 2? Or is it like ram in that its older, slower and
more expensive to stick with sata 2?
Lastly, I could toss a sata 3 SSD on this board and treat it like a
sata 2 SSD, sure, but is that wasting money? I really have no sense of
what an optimal price to performance ratio should be with SSDs right
now.

Second, and what ever you concluded after my first question will
matter here; whats the best 200 gig (or larger) SSD? Newegg seems to
agree with my budget here, But It seems like performance and
reliability are really at odds at this price range. Is there a magic
SSD out there that is really reliable and really fast for that price
and size?

I guess both my questions boil down to this: If your computer had the
same specs as mine, what SSD would you put in it for $200?


Intel Core i7-920 Bloomfield 2.66GHz LGA 1366 130W Quad-Core Processor

CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB (3 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3
12800) Triple Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model TR3X6G1600C8D

CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W ATX12V v2.2 SLI Certified CrossFire Ready 80
PLUS Certified Active PFC Compatible with Core i7

EVGA E758-A1 3-Way SLI (x16/x16/x8) LGA 1366 Intel X58 Part# 132-BL-E758-A1

EVGA SuperClocked 012-P3-1572-AR GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) 1280MB
320-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP

2 (two) x 1TB Western digital black edition hard drives

1 (one) x 2TB Western digital Green hard drive.
 
I ran my Crucial M4s on SATA II for a while. No problem. Aside from benchmarks I don't think there's a difference. They're still tons faster than any HDD.
 
random reads and writes of small files are not going to exceed 300MB/s, which is most common operation. SSD even on SATA1 would feel faster than any mechanical hard drive.
 
I replaced the 5400 RPM SATA II drive in my wife's new netbook with an M4. Before and after was night and day. I was going to get a SATA II SSD instead, but the deal I got on the M4 was too good to pass up, and it keeps that little notebook humming.
 
throw two cheap ssd in raid-0 and you'll get sata 3 speeds. Backup and never worry about it. iirc intel rst 11.5? supports trim raid-0?
 
throw two cheap ssd in raid-0 and you'll get sata 3 speeds. Backup and never worry about it. iirc intel rst 11.5? supports trim raid-0?

Would it not be cheaper to buy a sata 3 card and one M4? Then i wouldn't have to raid? I don't know about trim raid, but this board has Raid and AHCI.
 
Last edited:
Would it not be cheaper to buy a sata 3 card and one M4? Then i wouldn't have to raid?

NO!
I'm not an expert on this by any means, but the cheap sata 3 cards are slow. Hopefully someone will explain this correctly but, as I understand it, most of them run off of a single PCIE lane/channel (not sure of the terminology here) and do not have anything really approaching SATA 6GB speeds.

Research this well before you go that route.
 
throw two cheap ssd in raid-0 and you'll get sata 3 speeds. Backup and never worry about it. iirc intel rst 11.5? supports trim raid-0?

rst 11.5 currently only supports RAID 0 for win 8, though it is expected to offer it for win 7 at some point.

Would it not be cheaper to buy a sata 3 card and one M4? Then i wouldn't have to raid? I don't know about trim raid, but this board has Raid and AHCI.

Do not under any circumstances do this. Sata II performance on an sata 6gb/s ssd like the m4 is still excellent, and it will in most cases be faster than using an sata 6gb/s add on card.

NO!
I'm not an expert on this by any means, but the cheap sata 3 cards are slow. Hopefully someone will explain this correctly but, as I understand it, most of them run off of a single PCIE lane/channel (not sure of the terminology here) and do not have anything really approaching SATA 6GB speeds.

Research this well before you go that route.

Suffice to say that they aren't as good as the intel sata II ports.
 
NO!
I'm not an expert on this by any means, but the cheap sata 3 cards are slow. Hopefully someone will explain this correctly but, as I understand it, most of them run off of a single PCIE lane/channel (not sure of the terminology here) and do not have anything really approaching SATA 6GB speeds.

Research this well before you go that route.


PCIe bandwidth limitation. 4x PCIe , if it was 16x then it would be pretty much same performance as onboard. We dont have 16x SATA 3 cards.

Ive decided when I get my M4 512GB just connecting to the last remaining sata 2 port on my mobo. Plus I hear marvel controller has big issues, so getting a sata 3 card to work properly you have to disable your mobos controller. Forget PCIe cards... I will get 300mbps with sata 2 ,,, and of course a 0.001ms latency ,,,,, Right now it takes 3 minutes for OS to come up because I deleted readyboot... but SSD doesnt use readyboot soo Once I get SSD Ill be fine.
 
Back
Top