Currently I am pretty tight financially. I am afraid that things won't get better any time soon (daughter starting College in Sept, OT cut @ work, etc...). I just 'splurged' and bought Win7. Now before Win7 has even shipped, I started thinking that I might want to spend even more money to be sure that my 'upgrade' from XP won't have me complaining 'I knew I should have stayed with XP!'.
So, here are the current specs:
Windows XP Pro SP3
AMD PhII 555 (unlocked to Quad @ 3.5Ghz)
Asus M4A79XTD EVO motherboard (IIRC limited to 3GB SATA)
WD 640GB Black HD
2x2GB OCZ (OCZ3G1600LV2G)
BFG 8800GTS 640MB
HP ZR24w (24" 1920 x 1200 IPS)
I'd like for this upgrade to be a pleasant experience. I don't want to shoot myself in the foot by installing Win7 and then finding out that I am being bottlenecked by my HD (or memory, etc...). So here is what I am thinking, buy a decent SSD now and just use it for the O/S (and maybe a game or two) while using the 640GB for storage. Upgrade my Video Card and memory as needed down the line as money permits. Keep in mind that I do game a bit (currently BFBC2, maybe BF3 in a few months). I do rip and burn DVD's on occasion in addition to normal PC use.
I am pretty concerned that my 8800GTS will really start showing its age once I install Win7 (still at DX9 on XP). IIRC the 8800GTS was one of the first DX10 cards and I'm pretty sure that I'll need to upgrade that sooner rather then later. I'm hoping that BFBC2 will still play fine, but if it doesn't, I'll be pissed that I can't afford a really nice card.
At this point, I'm guessing that I'd have around $100 to spend for the drive (more before rebates).
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, Ken
BTW: Thanks ZAP for the SSD Sticky. I did read it BEFORE I wrote this post.
EDIT: FWIW, I see these are on sale:
Kingston SSDNow V+100 SVP100S2/96G 2.5" 96GB SATA II:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...8b0ae669383c83
OCZ Agility 2 OCZSSD2-2AGTE60G 2.5" 60GB SATA II:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...e4d2f23e553a76
They are both around $100 AMIR, but the OCZ is 60GB while the Kingston is 96GB. I don't know if the performance of the OCZ would be significantly better (in my case) to warrant the smaller size over the Kingston. Also, there are a lot of bad reviews for the OCZ drive on Newegg (reliability).
So, here are the current specs:
Windows XP Pro SP3
AMD PhII 555 (unlocked to Quad @ 3.5Ghz)
Asus M4A79XTD EVO motherboard (IIRC limited to 3GB SATA)
WD 640GB Black HD
2x2GB OCZ (OCZ3G1600LV2G)
BFG 8800GTS 640MB
HP ZR24w (24" 1920 x 1200 IPS)
I'd like for this upgrade to be a pleasant experience. I don't want to shoot myself in the foot by installing Win7 and then finding out that I am being bottlenecked by my HD (or memory, etc...). So here is what I am thinking, buy a decent SSD now and just use it for the O/S (and maybe a game or two) while using the 640GB for storage. Upgrade my Video Card and memory as needed down the line as money permits. Keep in mind that I do game a bit (currently BFBC2, maybe BF3 in a few months). I do rip and burn DVD's on occasion in addition to normal PC use.
I am pretty concerned that my 8800GTS will really start showing its age once I install Win7 (still at DX9 on XP). IIRC the 8800GTS was one of the first DX10 cards and I'm pretty sure that I'll need to upgrade that sooner rather then later. I'm hoping that BFBC2 will still play fine, but if it doesn't, I'll be pissed that I can't afford a really nice card.
At this point, I'm guessing that I'd have around $100 to spend for the drive (more before rebates).
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, Ken
BTW: Thanks ZAP for the SSD Sticky. I did read it BEFORE I wrote this post.
EDIT: FWIW, I see these are on sale:
Kingston SSDNow V+100 SVP100S2/96G 2.5" 96GB SATA II:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...8b0ae669383c83
OCZ Agility 2 OCZSSD2-2AGTE60G 2.5" 60GB SATA II:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...e4d2f23e553a76
They are both around $100 AMIR, but the OCZ is 60GB while the Kingston is 96GB. I don't know if the performance of the OCZ would be significantly better (in my case) to warrant the smaller size over the Kingston. Also, there are a lot of bad reviews for the OCZ drive on Newegg (reliability).
Last edited: