Well first of all so far there have been NO kind of any problems with either flash, so your whole theory is based on.. well imagination. There have been numerous tests to stress SSDs and so far the spektek flash hasn't shown any special dispositions. So I assume your whole theory is based on marketing and "Well if it costs more it must be better!". In reality it's nothing special to use different brands to sell basically the same product - actually that's marketing 101.The FACT is that SpecTek is a "lesser" brand than Micron. Why else would they have created the brand, to sell off their "factory seconds"?
I mean, if the memory is TRULY the same, then why go to the expense of having two separate brands? Answer - they are NOT truly the same.
Each and every problem with SSDs that was posted so far on this forum was caused by the firmware - if you dispute that fact I'm sure you'll be able to find a few threads where the problem was the flash, after all they're selling so much of this low quality stuff there should be plenty abound.
You obviously have no idea how IC testing works, so I'll just quote Mark (less work for me and we get another trusted source, now isn't that nice?):
Mark R said:Not only that, but SpekTec flash is more intensely tested than Intel's own name-brand stuff. That is spektec's business, sophisticated testing and binning of ICs. They are able to buy in dies and test them, when the OEMs don't want to spend the money on testing.
Intel selects its flash based on minimal testing and statistics. They choose a few dies to test thoroughly, and if they all pass, they don't bother fully testing the rest of the batch (the chips just get a quick check). They assume that if 10% of the chips are A1-prime quality, then the other 90% are.
SpekTec buys batches where the sampling has shown that some chips might be flaky. They then test every single die thoroughly, and carefully grade each individual die. The SpekTec chips that have been showing up on OCZ drives are those that have been tested to 'enhanced' specifications (i.e. tested to a higher level than the OEM used for testing).
Last edited: