SSD and no AHCI - problem?

rogigor

Junior Member
Jan 20, 2011
18
0
0
Hi,

I'm about to buy a Crucial m4 ssd and I've read a lot of guides how to optimize system for the drive. One of the points is to turn the AHCI in the bios but as I have just found out, my Abit IP35-E (Sata II, ICH9) does not support AHCI.

Does it have a big impact on performance ? I mean I don't care about benchmarks - I mean real life usage like, boot, programs launching etc. And how about TRIM - doesn't it have to have AHCI turned on ?

P.S. - I am also considering buying Kingston V+200 which, is worse than M4 but since it's on SandForce 2281 controller it has better built-in garbage collection. What do you think ?
 
Last edited:

tweakboy

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2010
9,517
2
81
www.hammiestudios.com
Well you can turn on AHCI thru a registry trick. The performance will be the same. For example Im at 260mbps and doing trick same 260 still. No change in boot up or app launch. People with RAID like to use that. For you just leave it alone.
 
Last edited:

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,202
126
TB, that registry hack only enable the AHCI driver stack. It still has to be enabled in BIOS and hardware.

OP, basically, AHCI is needed for hotplug support, and it allows limited storage device multitasking through the use of NCQ. If you don't have AHCI, expect your 4K-64thrd benchmarks to be no higher than your 4K benchmarks in CDM.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Hi,

I'm about to buy a Crucial m4 ssd and I've read a lot of guides how to optimize system for the drive. One of the points is to turn the AHCI in the bios but as I have just found out, my Abit IP35-E (Sata II, ICH9) does not support AHCI.
I'm pretty sure you can install Intel's RST and get NCQ w/ native non-AHCI SATA. NCQ is where the performance advantage comes from.

P.S. - I am also considering buying Kingston V+200 which, is worse than M4 but since it's on SandForce 2281 controller it has better built-in garbage collection. What do you think ?
The GC might be a bit more aggressive, but it's the compression that let's it get well under 1 WA, and there is a cost to that (performance reduces from use more than drives that get >1 WA). In 5-10 years, we'll really need such tricks, but today, you're talking about the difference between a 20+ year lifetime and 30+ year lifetime. All kinds of meh and shoulder-shrugging, IMO. IoW, "better," is not absolute, nor even objective, in this situation.
 

Coup27

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2010
2,140
3
81
There will not be a noticeable real world difference if you run the drive in IDE and not AHCI.
 

rogigor

Junior Member
Jan 20, 2011
18
0
0
TRIM does not require AHCI.

Well I've already send an email to Crucial about that. If It is true than I have no problem.

Assuming I do not need AHCI for TRIM which of the SSDs would you take - Crucial M4 64gb or Kingston V+200 120Gb ? (price for both is very similar in my case)
 
Last edited:

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
There will not be a noticeable real world difference if you run the drive in IDE and not AHCI.

I hate to be picky, but the alternate mode to AHCI is ATA, not IDE. IDE is a design condition (Integrated Drive Electronics) of hard drives, not a mode. I realize that IDE has become a common but inaccurate term for some HDDs, but it is not correct.

Anyway, your statement is correct if you replace IDE with ATA. :)
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
There will not be a noticeable real world difference if you run the drive in IDE and not AHCI.

I noticed a real world difference when going from ide mode to ahci with my x25m g2. I probably wouldn't have noticed the difference if I had gone back and forth between them when first getting the drive, but after using it for 18 mos or so with ide it was a very noticeable upgrade going to ahci.

edit: or ATA or whatever it's called.

Well I've already send an email to Crucial about that. If It is true than I have no problem.

Assuming I do not need AHCI for TRIM which of the SSDs would you take - Crucial M4 64gb or Kingston V+200 120Gb ? (price for both is very similar in my case)

I was able to manually TRIM my x25m g2 when it was in ata/ide mode. However, I know that crucial doesn't have an ssd toolbox to allow this and I don't think that Kingston does, either. What OS are you using? I'd stay away from sf 2281 ssd's other than intels, the GC on others is still pretty good.
 
Last edited:

Coup27

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2010
2,140
3
81
I hate to be picky, but the alternate mode to AHCI is ATA, not IDE. IDE is a design condition (Integrated Drive Electronics) of hard drives, not a mode. I realize that IDE has become a common but inaccurate term for some HDDs, but it is not correct.

Anyway, your statement is correct if you replace IDE with ATA. :)
Whilst true, the fast that most BIOS' out there all have "SATA Controller mode - AHCI or IDE" compounds the problem to a point where that if you don't refer to it also as IDE, people ask you "wtf is ATA?"

Screwed either way.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
Screwed either way.

Indeed! This is what happens when tech writing is done by non-native English speakers. Then when it gets used and proliferated by . . . <LOL>
 

rogigor

Junior Member
Jan 20, 2011
18
0
0
I was able to manually TRIM my x25m g2 when it was in ata/ide mode. However, I know that crucial doesn't have an ssd toolbox to allow this and I don't think that Kingston does, either. What OS are you using? I'd stay away from sf 2281 ssd's other than intels, the GC on others is still pretty good.


I am currently using Vista x64 but I'm going to switch to 7 x64 after the purchase.

I have just got the answer from crucial and they say that TRIM works only in AHCI. Well I will just buy the SSD as I was going to anyway and will test in on my own. If I am happy with the performance (and comparing to my hdd I probably will) then ok. If, however, I have some problems or drops in pefrormance, I will ... sight... upgrade to 1155.
 
Last edited:

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,767
1
76
I have just got the answer from crucial and they say that TRIM works only in AHCI. .

This contradicts the MSI faq

http://www.ocztechnology.com/ssdzone/ssd-faqs.html

also the OCZ faq is a good read as well

http://www.ocztechnology.com/ssdzone/ssd-faqs.html

I tend to believe the MSI faq simply because IDE has been around longer than AHCI, and both of them predate SSD's.

TRIM should not be dependent upon AHCI, but merely the drive itself and the host operating system.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
I am currently using Vista x64 but I'm going to switch to 7 x64 after the purchase.

I have just got the answer from crucial and they say that TRIM works only in AHCI. Well I will just buy the SSD as I was going to anyway and will test in on my own. If I am happy with the performance (and comparing to my hdd I probably will) then ok. If, however, I have some problems or drops in pefrormance, I will ... sight... upgrade to 1155.

I agree with the other posters, and my own experience was that I was able to manually TRIM even in XP. You likely got bad info from crucial tech support.

Regardless, I haven't TRIMMED by m4's since I got them (as they're in RAID 0), and I haven't noticed any dropoff. The GC on these newer ssd's is pretty awesome, a casual or moderate user could never TRIM a newer ssd and still maintain nearly-new performance indefinitely.
 

Emulex

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2001
9,759
1
71
kingston suck ballz at any QD and have heavy GC so they will be perfect for IDE mode!
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
kingston suck ballz at any QD and have heavy GC so they will be perfect for IDE mode!
They got a firmware update to help with that, and it seems to work, from what accounts I've read. In particular, low QD performance isn't the same as QD1, where it would trend that way. With that in mind, it shouldn't be a bad drive, especially on sale for $60-70 for 128GB, but it's nothing to get excited over, and not worth paying full price for. In fact, it's about perfect as a cheap SSD that a big vendor could just label as, "xxxGB MLC NAND solid state drive," and not get customer outrage as they charge 50-100% their costs for a cheap SSD, instead of installing something nicer :).
 
Last edited: