'Spider-Man 2' Set to Gross Up to $155M

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Unofficial estimates Sunday put the gross for "Spider-Man 2" in the $150 million to $155 million range since the film opened Wednesday, which would shatter the record for best Wednesday-Sunday opening set in May by "Shrek 2" with $129 million...

At around $90 million, the movie's estimated Friday-Sunday haul would fall well short of the record $114.8 million opening weekend of "Spider-Man" two years ago. The original "Spider-Man" opened on Friday, though, while the sequel debuted Wednesday, and millions of fans already had seen it before the weekend. "Spider-Man," which opened in early May, also didn't have the handicap of a Sunday holiday.
http://movies.yahoo.com/news/ap/20040704/108897816000.html
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
My god - that's amazing revenue. I imagine that is in the ballpark of what it cost to make the movie. I really liked it, and as far as I'm concerned this is good news.
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
I'll watch it when it comes out on video. I swear I was the oldest guy in the theatre when I watched the first one. Too many noisy kids ruined it.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Triumph

I agree with Triumph. It wasn't the greatest superhero movie ever.

At least you've found an ally!

Seriously, I wasn't THAT blown away by Spiderman 2, but I do think it's probably the best-ever superhero movie.

I thought Batman was really overrated and lacked everything but atmosphere, which it had in spades - the characters and plot were just blah. All the Batman sequels were horrible.

The Superman movies are hard to get through now, and weren't great even at the time.

IMO the X-Men films are pretty good, but not as good as Spiderman 1 and 2.

The Hulk was underrated IMO, but often dull, and again not as strong as the Spiderman films.

I don't think Spiderman 2 is one of history's greatest movies, but I do think it tops the superhero genre.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
I third Triumph's sentiment! :p

Batman 1 was fantastic in every respect imaginable, although I agree with you on most of your other points. I certainly enjoyed SM2, but it just wasn't as sensational as everyone makes it out to be.
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
It wasn't that good. Due to the hype, I was expecting something short of perfect.

However, it is better than most of tripe that came out this year.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: Pepsei
It wasn't that good. Due to the hype, I was expecting something short of perfect.

However, it is better than most of tripe that came out this year.

Ain't that the truth. SM2 and Garfield have been the only jems amongst an incredibly lackluster summer movie selection.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
I haven't seen it, but if its anything like the original, then I won't even bother. I didn't even finish watching the first one.
 

brunswickite

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
6,386
1
0
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: Pepsei
It wasn't that good. Due to the hype, I was expecting something short of perfect.

However, it is better than most of tripe that came out this year.

Ain't that the truth. SM2 and Garfield have been the only jems amongst an incredibly lackluster summer movie selection.

Garfield?!!!?
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: Pepsei
It wasn't that good. Due to the hype, I was expecting something short of perfect.

However, it is better than most of tripe that came out this year.

Ain't that the truth. SM2 and Garfield have been the only jems amongst an incredibly lackluster summer movie selection.

i've posted 2 or 3 threads complaining about the lack of good movies this summer and was shot down every time.

it has been a bad summer for movies.