Speed Difference between 2.7 GHZ and 3.5 GHZ

Agentbolt

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2004
3,340
1
0
A friend of mine is looking to build a budget system and was asking about the E4300. He wants a pretty fast processor that'll hit 3.3-3.5 GHZ.

The E4300 is definitely NOT guaranteed to hit those speeds, although it seems pretty much impossible to not at least hit 2.7-2.9 GHZ with one. Since he's trying to do this all cheap, what I was curious about is just HOW much difference there'd be in real world apps between those two speeds. He mostly plays games and web surfs, watches a few movies. He'd be getting most of the other standard stuff, an 8800GTS, 2 gigs of RAM, a 320 GB Seagate HDD.

Are we talking a few frames per second in some games, or would there be a really big, noticeable difference in speed? Just curious, thanks
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
since you have that equipment, why don't you down clock and let us know?
 

Agentbolt

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2004
3,340
1
0
I don't really have the know-how to run a bunch of benchmarks, but yeah, I guess I'd better learn. Thanks anyway
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Why not get an E6300? The E4300 is good for the high multiplier combined with motherboards that don't overclock well - as in mATX boards. Well, also can get by with cheaper RAM. If your friend is going with decent RAM and a regular ATX board, then may as well get the E6300 since those seem to be hitting those clocks with slightly lower vcore (though that may just be my imagination).
 

trojan698

Junior Member
Feb 21, 2007
4
0
0
^ Agreed on the E6300 front, they all seem to do 3GHz+ and you'd probably spend the same on ram anyway (PC6400). I doubt theres a great deal of money to be saved by going down the E4300 front.

In response to the question I think there is sufficient performance difference to warrant the extra moola especially when you're running a high end graphics card.

Hi btw, first post. :)
 

mithrandir2001

Diamond Member
May 1, 2001
6,545
1
0
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
build a budget system ... wants a pretty fast processor
Of course he wants a pretty fast processor. Who doesn't? But if he's building a "budget" system he should be happy with 2.7 or 3.5 GHz, Can't expect the world unless money is no object.