sdifox
No Lifer
- Sep 30, 2005
- 99,368
- 17,551
- 126
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: evident
I don't mean to threadjack, but what is the advantage of using studio monitors over a receiver and bookshelf combo? aside from not having to put a huge receiver somewhere.
I have a pioneer elite receiver and two bookshelf speakers (no sub) and it sounds amazing. I sold my logitech z5500 and went with a receiver+ bookshelf route a few years ago and it's been great.
I was going to recommend the OP get a cheap but decent receiver and a nice pair of bookshelfs, which would give him good SQ and the option to expand his stereo if he needed.
nothing wrong with going with speaker + receiver. Buying used would yield great sounding system at a low cost. It's just that studio monitors are designed for near field application and normal speakers are not and given his setup, nearfield makes sense.
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Studio monitors are voiced for near-field listening. Some normal consumer-grade speakers are voiced with mid-far field in mind. Their design incorporates the expected decay of the treble for that distance and could be too "bright" if listened to up-close.
Then again, this effect could be ameliorated by the comb-filtering that results from Speaker Boundary Interface Response (i.e. reflections from the table surface, wall behind the speaker, the monitor, etc.)
Thanks, that was very informative. I don't keep my bookshelfs on my desk, they are on the sides of my TV which is facing my right ear. I need to find a better layout to have them facing me in the front when im computering.
You can just buy 1 monitor then
http://www.amazon.com/KRK-RP6G...qid=1223583629&sr=8-10