If the type of plugs can be used for different vehicles, there is no reason to expect the gap to be set correctly.
I was always told when I purchased plugs and/or a mechanic installed then, to double check the gap.
Larger gap is weaker spark. Smaller gap is not coordinated explosion.
It'd have to be a LOT larger gap to weaken the spark. A little larger, and you have a stronger spark.
These 100k mile or more plugs have huge increases in the gaps as they wear, and it has the effect of making the sparks stronger.
Only when the coil starts having trouble actually having enough energy to jump the gap does the spark get smaller.
I remember back in the early 90's, when the first Ford Explorers came out with regular Platinum plugs instead of Copper, they were rated for 60k instead of 30k. So a couple of years later, they started showing up for 60k services and we replaced them.
Then we had numerous people coming back, complaining about reduced fuel mileage. And this would be on vehicle we did everything on....fuel filters, tranny/coolant service, injector/throttle body cleans, air filters.....a vehicle you'd think would be in top working order.
We couldn't figure it out for the longest time, then our Ford district engineer told us it was the plugs.....we replaced plugs that had their gaps worn up to .080" and sometimes even bigger, with new plugs with the stock gap, which IIRC was like .052-.056".
The gap increase actually made the spark stronger, and it had more efficient combustion as a result, and slightly better mileage.
Now granted, that was with the old EEC-IV computer systems, and they weren't as adaptable as the OBD-II's are, so with modern cars there isn't much difference, but the point is, you'd have to have a HUGE gap increase to have an actual weaker spark.