I was just reading about that someplace. (Can't find where.) It takes more fuel to fly back to land; so if they can land on a boat they can launch heavier payloads.The whole boat thing seemed like an unnecessary variable to throw in with something this complex.
I was just reading about that someplace. (Can't find where.) It takes more fuel to fly back to land; so if they can land on a boat they can launch heavier payloads.
And it was just several decades ago that we first got rockets up to space.What a day to be alive!
Orbital payloads just got way cheaper, well the method at least. IIRC Musk say it'd reduce the cost to 1/100th. I have a feeling he's going to make bank resupplying the ISS, and save the tax payers a boat load.
And it was just several decades ago that we first got rockets up to space.
"I know! Let's bring them back down with rocket engines too!"
...
If there's an increase in rocket launches though as the price comes down, I wonder what's going to happen to the space-junk situation? Isn't LEO a bit of a mess already?
Nice work by them! The whole boat thing seemed like an unnecessary variable to throw in with something this complex.
If there's an increase in rocket launches though as the price comes down, I wonder what's going to happen to the space-junk situation? Isn't LEO a bit of a mess already?
I can understand how geosynchronous satellites are cheaper to launch from the equator (closer to final destination)
But the ISS is not in a steady orbit, so I'm not sure.