Ouch. Not only dump Nvidia, but totally switched sides and went to ATi (this is still a rumor or what?)
Even Asus didn't go that far.
I'm beginning to think that Nvidia cores are fundamentally weak because they rely too heavily on raw local memory bandwidth. I mean, the original GF3/4's were great because the memory that they were matched with kept up with the GPU.
I started to become concerned when I saw the GF5800 using DDR2 about 2 years before Nvidia should have even considered it. Now I see 2.2 to 2.5ns memory Nvidia videocards barely keeping up with 2.8 and 3.3ns cards from ATi (add insult, a lot of ATi card have no heatsinks on the memory, some entire cards are heatsink only cooled too.)
All this seems to point to a core deficiency that relies far too heavily on memory speed that is just not advancing anywhere near as fast and Nvidia needs it to be competitive.
Even Asus didn't go that far.
I'm beginning to think that Nvidia cores are fundamentally weak because they rely too heavily on raw local memory bandwidth. I mean, the original GF3/4's were great because the memory that they were matched with kept up with the GPU.
I started to become concerned when I saw the GF5800 using DDR2 about 2 years before Nvidia should have even considered it. Now I see 2.2 to 2.5ns memory Nvidia videocards barely keeping up with 2.8 and 3.3ns cards from ATi (add insult, a lot of ATi card have no heatsinks on the memory, some entire cards are heatsink only cooled too.)
All this seems to point to a core deficiency that relies far too heavily on memory speed that is just not advancing anywhere near as fast and Nvidia needs it to be competitive.