• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sony makes big splash in DSLR world -- official announcement of Alpha 100

AndrewR

Lifer
In case anyone missed it, Sony bought Konica-Minolta's camera business earlier this year, and yesterday they issued the official announcement on their first model DSLR, the Alpha 100 which is their introductory DSLR which nominally replaces the KM 5D. The replacement for the 7D is expected in September.

Along with the new camera, Sony is introducing 20 or so lenses with their brand, most of which are rebadged Minolta lenses. Some are brand new, however, as Sony has established a deal with Zeiss to produce DSLR lenses for the Alpha line. Zeiss is making a 16-80 zoom, and two primes: 85mm and 135mm.

Ok, specs of the new camera:
-10.2MP CCD sensor (might be similar or the same as Nikon's D200 sensor)
-Super Steady Shot (formerly Anti-Shake) built into the body so every lens reduces blur -- Sony claims up to 3.5 stops benefit, ie., they improved the blur reduction
-Anti-dust system that prevents dust from adhering with a new coating and removes any dust with a "shake"
-A new hardware engine for picture processing
-750-shot battery life (unfortunately not InfoLithium)
-Retail price: $899 for body only, $999 for body with 18-70mm kit lens

There's more in the preview below, but those are highlights. Now, do I wait until July or get a cheaper 7D today? 🙂

Here's the Sony link: Sony Alpha site
And here's the preview at DPReview: Alpha 100
 
IF the mount is backwards compatible with older Konica Minolta lenses, then I'm very interested. Always good to see some competition in a market dominated by Canon and to a lesser extent, Nikkon. Olympus and Pentax haven't exactly put the hurt on the other two, but Sony has lots of muscle. Should be interesting.
 
didn't sony buy the zeiss name off konica minolta? i seem to remember that zeiss was a konica minolta trademark. in that case, sony wouldn't have 'an agreement' with zeiss.
 
problem is the camera will not allow you to take pictures with anything that is copyrighted in the background. so if you are at disney it wont allow you to take a picture. also when you move the pictures to the computer they will only stay on the machine for an hour and you can not print them out. also it installs a kit that allows Sony to look on the machine to make sure you are not cheating.

and everything i said i pulled out of my ass.
 
Originally posted by: Passions
Canon > Sony.

Don't care what the heck camera Sony comes out with, CANON rules the DSLR world, period.

i have had a Canon A40 and an A80. I still use the A80 and i love it. I really do not need anything bigger th en the 4megapixel. though wouldnt mind a DSLR but they are still more then i want to spend.
 
I'd seriously wait until it's been out for a bit before investing in that.

I'm a Canon fanboy though and own a few L-series lenses so I'm not planning on buying anything that doesn't say Canon on it.
 
Originally posted by: goku
Wouldn't be surprised if they used proprietary lenses and wouldn't accept other lenses just for the sheer fact they're sony.

Compatible with Minolta Maxxum lenses...
 
Originally posted by: So
Do most DSLR's stillf use CF and not SD? If so, why?

Probably because SD used to be so damn expensive, and first/second gen DSLRs used CF and Microdrives for cost and bigger capacity. A lot of DSLR users and pros have a lot invested in CF, and it would be stupid for an prosumer or pro camera to ignore that and go with SD.
 
So when I see people using their camera upside down or complaining about disc read errors on their camera, I'll know they're using a Sony.
 
Back
Top