• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Somewhat different YACT (College thread)

Hubris

Platinum Member
I'm currently going to Cornell, but I've been thinking a lot lately about transferring.

First, some background: I plan on double majoring in English and History and becoming a high school teacher when I graduate.

What really got me thinking was that teachers are so deperately needed in this country that having gone to Cornell won't really net me a better teaching position. And even if it does, it'll probably only be a few thousand dollars more a year, and with what I would save going to a state school, it wouldn't really be more money anyway.

I've been thinking about transferring to the University of Rhode Island or UMass. I live in RI so would qualify for low tuition to either of those places. It just doesn't make sense to me to be paying $40,000 a year on college when I'm "just" going to be a teacher making basically fvck all for pay.

The problem really comes in from two directions:

The first is, I don't know if I'll get a better education at UMass or URI, though I haven't exactly been blown away by the classes here at Cornell, either. I'll admit it, though, the "prestige" of the Cornell name is gonna be hard to give up. That's probably not the best reason to stay, but it IS a factor.

The second one is that state schools don't tend to give out as much money in grants. So, for Cornell, I'm paying about $15,000 in loans. About $20,000 a year is in the form of a Cornell grant. So, assuming I have to pay most of the state school tuition in loans, etc., it would only be a few thousand dollars cheaper per year. Is that really enough of an incentive to transfer, considering the "prestige" of the Cornell name?

Any opinions would be most appreciated.
 
I'd stay at Cornell for the experience alone (I turned down Cornell after I was admitted to go elsewhere; but an equally top school). You get as much of an education from your peers as your books, and the quality of the student body at Cornell is much better than the state schools you're considering. In the end, you may end up regretting not staying at Cornell for 4 years and having the Cornell name; probably moreso than regretting that you got your Cornell degree but should have gone elsewhere.

Good luck!
 
Stay at Cornell... the money that you save isn't really worth the transfer. I was also accepted into Cornell but decided to go to another school. I think you should base your decision on how much you like it there so far. The reason I chose against it was based on location, environment etc... But if you're enjoying your stay there, and everything is going well... then why change?
 
Well, props on wanting to be a teacher. We desperately need good teachers here. Anyways, if you like it there and the difference really is as small as you say, then I see no reason to transfer.
 
Back
Top