AyashiKaibutsu
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2004
- 9,306
- 4
- 81
Other than being a telco shill hes actually a very smart guy. No reason to knock him.
Being a blatent telco shill is sufficient reason.
Other than being a telco shill hes actually a very smart guy. No reason to knock him.
This is kind of like hearing a woman screaming in pain or for help gives police the right to enter a house or apartment for the safety of individuals.
Under the constitution, yes, that is EXACTLY what defines the letter of the law. It's the whole PURPOSE of the USSC, to interpret the law AS IS.So you believe that is all it takes to make it right?
So am I to assume you believe that they were also correct in Plessy v. Ferguson or Dred Scott v. Sandford decisions as well?
If people are doing bad things and get caught then why do the circumstances matter?
Brown-Forman, that owns Jack Daniel's among many other spirit brands, is in fact based in Louisville, just FYI
but even then, won't someone think of the horses?!
Being a blatent telco shill is sufficient reason.
yeah, pretty much.
I hate the telcos as much as the next guy, but you cant fault him for trying to make a living.
