Bignate's idea seems the most realistic. Government money is there if you need it, but you need to do a bunch of dull busy work that sucks. Sort of like the work at McDonalds. Wipe this counter even though the counter is cleaner than the drug addicts who come in the door. Mop the floor even though it's already clean. Wash your hands after using the bathroom even though I obviously did not shit on my hands this time. Pointless busy work.
True that. Day care for some people is more expensive than my rent. This is why some of the more socialist countries have free day care. It means you can actually have a job that is worth doing.I agree sort-of.
Just daycare for one kid can potentially make 'having a job' pay less than welfare. In fact, daycare can easily cost more than the total pay for a crappy job.
I agree sort-of.
Just daycare for one kid can potentially make 'having a job' pay less than welfare. In fact, daycare can easily cost more than the total pay for a crappy job.
Increase the number of kids, and it becomes absolute that daycare will cost more than work pays. So staying home with the kids is often the 'highest paying' job under the current system.
We can all bitch and moan all we like about this, but it's reality. My guess is that as the economy continues to shift away from manufacturing, with lower-value service jobs filling the void, this problem is going to get worse, not better.
So either we find a comprehensive way to attack the problem head-on, or we end up fucked.
