• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Someone is getting fired

idk why someone would get fired. they said it increases chance of stroke/heart attack...now they say it doesn't. if you're saying the scientist that said it increases risk is going to get fired, i'm sure they have better things to do than that
 
I wonder what this will do to all of the lawsuits that are pending. The moment this drug was recalled, lawyers pounced on the opportunity to make a quick buck.
 
Originally posted by: alimoalem
idk why someone would get fired. they said it increases chance of stroke/heart attack...now they say it doesn't. if you're saying the scientist that said it increases risk is going to get fired, i'm sure they have better things to do than that
edit oops nm
 
Originally posted by: AaronB
I wonder what this will do to all of the lawsuits that are pending. The moment this drug was recalled, lawyers pounced on the opportunity to make a quick buck.

yeap. it was the new fen/phen

i took vioxx for about ayear. i had lawyers calling and mailing me wanting to represent me in a suit.

Since my heart is fine i never bothered with it.
 
Originally posted by: iwantanewcomputer
wow...if this is true. They already lost billions on this, even if the drug comes back on the market.

I wouldnt use it. not because of the faulty research. but because it really does not work.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: iwantanewcomputer
wow...if this is true. They already lost billions on this, even if the drug comes back on the market.

I wouldnt use it. not because of the faulty research. but because it really does not work.

really? I thought the drug really did a good job in eliminating arthritis pain.. there were even people willing ot sign waivers to be able to take the drug again
 
Originally posted by: z0mb13
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: iwantanewcomputer
wow...if this is true. They already lost billions on this, even if the drug comes back on the market.

I wouldnt use it. not because of the faulty research. but because it really does not work.

really? I thought the drug really did a good job in eliminating arthritis pain.. there were even people willing ot sign waivers to be able to take the drug again

it didnt do a thing for my arthritis pain. though vioxx is intended for mild arthritis. i have it a little worse then that.(have a standing priscription for darvacet).

the pain clinic i go to also said not many people found vioxx helpfull.
 
Back
Top