• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Someone at Capcom is getting Fired

Even after looking at the blown up picture, I still don't see anything... I'm sure it's there, but I only see compression artifacts.
 
I do see it and it's really a shame, I wonder how little money Capcom spent on Okawii, it's just a port with (as I hear) worse graphics and nothing new added.
 
wow, i barely make it out. I don't think I would have ever noticed. The Imagine Babies watermark one is worse though IMO, it's far more blatant.
 
That's almost impossible to see, but damn that is hilarious. Wouldn't they have the original picture that came from IGN? Wouldn't it originally have come from Capcom? Wow.
 
Originally posted by: Piuc2020
I do see it and it's really a shame, I wonder how little money Capcom spent on Okawii, it's just a port with (as I hear) worse graphics and nothing new added.
Click to expand...

I heard the waggle controls suck compared to the PS2 version and they took out the paper filter that made everything look like a painting. The comparison pictures make the Wii version inferior
 
Originally posted by: potato28
I see compression, not a watermark.
Click to expand...

It's there. Don't look at the close-up shot first, look at the overall shot. See the logo here at the top and center of the IGN page? Now look at the cover shot just in front of the wolf's mouth.

Anyway, that is pretty dumb. I would imagine that IGN's picture came from Capcom originally anyway, so how is it that the person designing the cover was unable to get some of the original artwork for the cover?
 
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: potato28
I see compression, not a watermark.
Click to expand...

It's there. Don't look at the close-up shot first, look at the overall shot. See the logo here at the top and center of the IGN page? Now look at the cover shot just in front of the wolf's mouth.

Anyway, that is pretty dumb. I would imagine that IGN's picture came from Capcom originally anyway, so how is it that the person designing the cover was unable to get some of the original artwork for the cover?
Click to expand...

Was probably given a deadline and realized there was no way to make it. The pic was readily available so why not? Oops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top