- Jan 15, 2001
- 15,069
- 94
- 91
my friend seems to think that a 10gb IDE drive is faster than a 60gb ide drive that is 7200rpm ata100
his reasoning: it has less to catalogue on startup, no matter how fast the big one is or how slow the small one is
i tried explaining the fact that what he was saying was not true and the buffer has a LOT to do with it
a small 7200rpm ata100 drive and a big 7200rpm ata100 drive with a bigger buffer...which one really is faster??
everything ive ever read tells me the bigger one is faster because it is the same amount of physical disk space but its more compact so the lens has a LOT less further to go to find the data...
maybe that is totally skewed from the real reason, but someone please inform me of the true answer please
his reasoning: it has less to catalogue on startup, no matter how fast the big one is or how slow the small one is
i tried explaining the fact that what he was saying was not true and the buffer has a LOT to do with it
a small 7200rpm ata100 drive and a big 7200rpm ata100 drive with a bigger buffer...which one really is faster??
everything ive ever read tells me the bigger one is faster because it is the same amount of physical disk space but its more compact so the lens has a LOT less further to go to find the data...
maybe that is totally skewed from the real reason, but someone please inform me of the true answer please