"Some US assertions from the last war on Iraq still appear dubious."

db

Lifer
Dec 6, 1999
10,575
292
126
It doesn't instill in me a lot of confidence in our leaders when I read something like this (linked) article. Is it really necessary to lie to us?

"Citing top-secret satellite images, Pentagon officials estimated in mid?September that up to 250,000 Iraqi troops and 1,500 tanks stood on the border, threatening the key US oil supplier.

But when the St. Petersburg Times in Florida acquired two commercial Soviet satellite images of the same area, taken at the same time, no Iraqi troops were visible near the Saudi border ? just empty desert.

"It was a pretty serious fib," says Jean Heller, the Times journalist who broke the story.

The White House is now making its case to Congress and the public for another invasion of Iraq..."

CSMonitor.com

"This is not a problem unique to George Bush. It's every president I've known, and I've worked with seven or eight of them," Hamilton says. "All, at some time or another, used intelligence to support their political objectives.

"Information is power, and the temptation to use information to achieve the results you want is almost overwhelming," he says. "The whole intelligence community knows exactly what the president wants [regarding Iraq], and most are in their jobs because of the president ? certainly the people at the top ? and they will do everything they can to support the policy."
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
There are plenty of fair and reasonable reasons why a person can in good faith say they disagree with the idea of attacking Iraq under the present circumstances. This is not one of them.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: glenn1
There are plenty of fair and reasonable reasons why a person can in good faith say they disagree with the idea of attacking Iraq under the present circumstances. This is not one of them.