SOME Trump Supporters Think Mueller's Grand Jury Has Too Many Black People

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,766
18,045
146
Im obviously late to this party, but from the article...

"The complaint about who serves on the D.C. grand jury was clearly a bad faith argument from someone who appears sympathetic to Trump and ― based on the fact that they were called to testify ― may have information of interest to Mueller’s team.

Natasha Bertrand, a reporter for Business Insider, tweeted that she was pitched the story about the grand jury’s racial makeup about a month ago and “genuinely thought the person was joking.” Yet the Page Six column quickly gained traction in conservative media circles Tuesday night.

Gateway Pundit wrote that the Page Six report indicated the grand jury was completely biased “and full of liberal hacks who most likely hate President Trump” and said it was “way past time for the unconstitutional witch hunt to be shut down.”

gg gateway pundit...just another right wing nutter site. oh, but theyre not racists either. the real racists are people who point out the racism!
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,203
12,852
136
Yea so, if 90% dislikes Trump, and a grand jury of that representation is a witch hunt.. Then let the hunt begin.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
55,858
13,985
146
Im obviously late to this party, but from the article...

"The complaint about who serves on the D.C. grand jury was clearly a bad faith argument from someone who appears sympathetic to Trump and ― based on the fact that they were called to testify ― may have information of interest to Mueller’s team.

Natasha Bertrand, a reporter for Business Insider, tweeted that she was pitched the story about the grand jury’s racial makeup about a month ago and “genuinely thought the person was joking.” Yet the Page Six column quickly gained traction in conservative media circles Tuesday night.

Gateway Pundit wrote that the Page Six report indicated the grand jury was completely biased “and full of liberal hacks who most likely hate President Trump” and said it was “way past time for the unconstitutional witch hunt to be shut down.”

gg gateway pundit...just another right wing nutter site. oh, but theyre not racists either. the real racists are people who point out the racism!

Pcgeek11 - pwned

Can we change the thread title back now please?
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,056
27,785
136
Pcgeek11 - pwned

Can we change the thread title back now please?
Prime case why topics involving race can't even be discussed by some people. I tried to have an honest discourse about the motives of the people bitching about black people and he couldn't even acknowledge these people were racist. I made no disparaging comments about their race or about pcgeek but he just stomped his feet and bailed.

My theory is Trump did the same thing bitching about "Mexican judges" being unable to do their job because of their race. It points out he regularly lathers up the guy with the same attitude. It points a finger as his own moral character.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,319
4,434
136
Prime case why topics involving race can't even be discussed by some people. I tried to have an honest discourse about the motives of the people bitching about black people and he couldn't even acknowledge these people were racist. I made no disparaging comments about their race or about pcgeek but he just stomped his feet and bailed.

My theory is Trump did the same thing bitching about "Mexican judges" being unable to do their job because of their race. It points out he regularly lathers up the guy with the same attitude. It points a finger as his own moral character.

Oh, you are a liar.

There were no "people" there was a "person". Your thread title was a lie and corrected by a moderator.

I stated that You are a race baiter and was done with your stupidity.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
55,858
13,985
146
No because the original title was a lie.

No, no it wasn't. It said "Trump supporters." Not "all Trump supporters."

And considering the fact that this is now shown to be WIDELY believed and complained about by Trump supporters, the original thread title was correct.

Every single right-wing outlet is carrying the story and takes the side claiming bias because of the racial makeup of the jury.

From the NY Post to Infowars to Daily Caller to Ann Coulter to Brietbart to Fox News.

Every. Single. Rightwing. Outlet.

Mods? Please?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,056
27,785
136
No, no it wasn't. It said "Trump supporters." Not "all Trump supporters."

And considering the fact that this is now shown to be WIDELY believed and complained about by Trump supporters, the original thread title was correct.

Every single right-wing outlet is carrying the story and takes the side claiming bias because of the racial makeup of the jury.

From the NY Post to Infowars to Daily Caller to Ann Coulter to Brietbart to Fox News.

Every. Single. Rightwing. Outlet.

Mods? Please?
You expect PCgeek to be able to read? Remember this comes from a guy who constantly fluffs Trump a POTUS who lies about everything on a regular basis.

Ironing not lost.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,056
27,785
136
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,319
4,434
136
No, no it wasn't. It said "Trump supporters." Not "all Trump supporters."

And considering the fact that this is now shown to be WIDELY believed and complained about by Trump supporters, the original thread title was correct.

Every single right-wing outlet is carrying the story and takes the side claiming bias because of the racial makeup of the jury.

From the NY Post to Infowars to Daily Caller to Ann Coulter to Brietbart to Fox News.

Every. Single. Rightwing. Outlet.

Mods? Please?

Keep crying. The original was referencing an article that said "Some" which was in fact one. So easy to leave off that one word and change the implied meaning of the article.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,319
4,434
136
You expect PCgeek to be able to read? Remember this comes from a guy who constantly fluffs Trump a POTUS who lies about everything on a regular basis.

Ironing not lost.

I seem to manage to read your lies quite well.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,056
27,785
136
Keep crying. The original was referencing an article that said "Some" which was in fact one. So easy to leave off that one word and change the implied meaning of the article.
Listen Skippy, leaving off "Some" is more accurate then you think. You idol already thinks minorities are incapable of doing their job in court. Its safe to say among Trump supporters there are more then 2 with this view which is already "Some"
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
55,858
13,985
146
Keep crying. The original was referencing an article that said "Some" which was in fact one. So easy to leave off that one word and change the implied meaning of the article.

And since then the same opinion has been parroted by every single right-wing outlet.

So it would seem adding "some" to this headline would be akin to adding "some" to "republicans are anti-abortion."