I recently put together a new system with a PCIe MB and decided to wait for the next gen, so I put in a vanilla 6600 I got from newegg refurbed for $60. Now that the 7800 is out, available and priced much lower then expected, I am pretty tempted to get this thing, but I feel I may hold off a few months and see how ATI's R520 release goes and their pricing. I personally do not care whether my card is ATI or Nvidia, as long as I think it's the best bang for the buck. In fact, I love this cheap 6600 because I got the card to 550/700 right off the bat with no stability problems and it runs quite a bit faster then my previous 9700 pro (both being overclocked).
However, looking at everything coming down the pike, I think ATI will win this round of the high end war in this generation. The specs on a single R520 versus a 7800 show the 520R, at least on paper, as a faster, cooler and less energy using card-
24 "Pipelines"
32 Texture Units
96 Arithmetic Logic Units (ALU)
192 Shader Operations per Cycle
700MHz Core
134.4 Billion Shader Operations per Second (at 700MHz)
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR3 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
300-350 Million Transistors
90nm Manufacturing
Shader Model 3.0
ATI HyperMemory
ATI Multi Rendering Technology (AMR)
Launch: Q4 2005?
Performance: Over 3x Radeon X800 XT !!! (for single R520)
16x stochastic FSAA
FP32 blending, texturing
Programmable Primitive Processor/Tesselator
The kicker is you can slap in any lower end 800 series or above ATI card with this card in a standard SLI board and get a big jump in performance over base specs. Instead of buying 2 identicle 7800s for SLI, ATI users can get a higher end R520 and either use it with an existing ATI card they already use or buy a cheaper X800XL type card which should be under $150 by the R520 release.
A lot remains to be seen as far as what ATI will price their cards at and if the specs being touted for the series are accurate, but even if Nvidia comes out on top, prices on the 7800 will also drop quite a bit when the 520R is competing with it.
However, looking at everything coming down the pike, I think ATI will win this round of the high end war in this generation. The specs on a single R520 versus a 7800 show the 520R, at least on paper, as a faster, cooler and less energy using card-
24 "Pipelines"
32 Texture Units
96 Arithmetic Logic Units (ALU)
192 Shader Operations per Cycle
700MHz Core
134.4 Billion Shader Operations per Second (at 700MHz)
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR3 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
300-350 Million Transistors
90nm Manufacturing
Shader Model 3.0
ATI HyperMemory
ATI Multi Rendering Technology (AMR)
Launch: Q4 2005?
Performance: Over 3x Radeon X800 XT !!! (for single R520)
16x stochastic FSAA
FP32 blending, texturing
Programmable Primitive Processor/Tesselator
The kicker is you can slap in any lower end 800 series or above ATI card with this card in a standard SLI board and get a big jump in performance over base specs. Instead of buying 2 identicle 7800s for SLI, ATI users can get a higher end R520 and either use it with an existing ATI card they already use or buy a cheaper X800XL type card which should be under $150 by the R520 release.
A lot remains to be seen as far as what ATI will price their cards at and if the specs being touted for the series are accurate, but even if Nvidia comes out on top, prices on the 7800 will also drop quite a bit when the 520R is competing with it.
