- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,811
- 198
- 106
The main factor for this decision is the up front cost to the doctor.
Discontinuing vaccines could have an adverse affect on public health. The government needs to step in and make sure cost is not a deciding factor.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/...ered-discontinuing-vaccinations-because-cost/
Why can't the government subsidize up front cost of vaccines? Maybe provide a tax break, or grants to make sure doctors and patients are not affected by the cost.
Discontinuing vaccines could have an adverse affect on public health. The government needs to step in and make sure cost is not a deciding factor.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/...ered-discontinuing-vaccinations-because-cost/
Ten percent of pediatricians say they have seriously considered no longer providing vaccines due to concerns about their cost, according to results from a 2011 survey.
That number is actually somewhat encouraging, said coauthor Megan Lindley, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta.
"This echoes findings from a survey that CDC did four years earlier in 2007," she said, and seeing that the 10 percent figure has not gone up is a good sign.
Why can't the government subsidize up front cost of vaccines? Maybe provide a tax break, or grants to make sure doctors and patients are not affected by the cost.
