Some pediatricians considered discontinuing vaccinations

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
The main factor for this decision is the up front cost to the doctor.

Discontinuing vaccines could have an adverse affect on public health. The government needs to step in and make sure cost is not a deciding factor.

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/...ered-discontinuing-vaccinations-because-cost/

Ten percent of pediatricians say they have seriously considered no longer providing vaccines due to concerns about their cost, according to results from a 2011 survey.

That number is actually somewhat encouraging, said coauthor Megan Lindley, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta.

"This echoes findings from a survey that CDC did four years earlier in 2007," she said, and seeing that the 10 percent figure has not gone up is a good sign.

Why can't the government subsidize up front cost of vaccines? Maybe provide a tax break, or grants to make sure doctors and patients are not affected by the cost.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Hopefully. The mods eventually set a limit on the number of threads A420 could create. I'd support the same thing in this case.

You want to flame me for talking about public health?

What kind of sick person are you that you want to see measles, mumps, whooping cough, polio,,,, come back?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,117
31,105
136
Oh so you are for vaccinations today.

Sorry I think thraashman was expecting this to be tomorrow's thread.
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,355
5,047
136
Since the survey was from 2011 and the Affordable Care Act called for an increase in Medicaid and CHIP vaccine reimbursement for at least 2013 and 2014 the entire issue could be a non-issue. And, since the doctors only "considered" discontinuing it and apparently didn't, there really isn't any issue. And, since the "issue" seemed to be not the cost of the vaccines but that the reimbursement for the administration of them wasn't as high for Medicaid as it was for private insurers, again it would be a non-issue as to govt subsidizing up front costs.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,338
136
Since the survey was from 2011 and the Affordable Care Act called for an increase in Medicaid and CHIP vaccine reimbursement for at least 2013 and 2014 the entire issue could be a non-issue. And, since the doctors only "considered" discontinuing it and apparently didn't, there really isn't any issue. And, since the "issue" seemed to be not the cost of the vaccines but that the reimbursement for the administration of them wasn't as high for Medicaid as it was for private insurers, again it would be a non-issue as to govt subsidizing up front costs.
Should have just locked his dumb ass...


:p

"sup, Allison?
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
This thread went places....the same places my joke threads go...to the crapper...heheheee