Pretty cheap, certainly compared to the cost (and difficulty) of filling it with metal.
You'd need about the same strength of container whether it held water, rocks, metal, after all, a ton is a ton is a ton and if you swing it around in a flimsy rigging / container, you'll have problems.
All kinds of cheap water tanks are available, collapsable / inflatable, metal, plastic.
You could use surplus 55 gallon drums (55G H2O = 458#, x4 = 1832# of H2O + the weight of the drums and framework).
Obviously a dumpster or similar container would be trivial to line with a pond liner and could contain more water than you'd really want to use.
If you close the top with a lid or pond liner or whatever it isn't going to slosh / leak much, especially if you add some extra space in there to allow for it to slosh a bit and not go over the side.
If you want to spend $1000+ for steel weights or whatever I'm sure you could use those... I don't really see the point compared to something that is much cheaper and easier to handle / get / transport / get rid of.
Originally posted by: Goldfish4209
Well, previously, we used gym weights and that worked pretty good. Would it be pretty cheap to build a giant bucket? It'll be swinging around, and we don't want it to be slopping all over the place.
Of course, if we had the means/sheer will to get DU, we'd probably go for DU.