'Some Evidence on Iraq Called Fake'

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think Blix also found no sign of a nuke program in pakistan either.

What's worse . . . Blix's ignorance or American duplicity?

Maybe if the UN was interested in doing real inspections, maybe this problem would not exist.

What do "real inspections" consist of??
I'm just curious
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
I think Blix also found no sign of a nuke program in pakistan either.

What's worse . . . Blix's ignorance or American duplicity?

Maybe if the UN was interested in doing real inspections, maybe this problem would not exist.

What do "real inspections" consist of??
I'm just curious

Inspections, real or not, could never find all of the weapons hidden in Iraq. The resolution called for full and active cooperation from Iraq.

That is what has not been seen.

 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
What do "real inspections" consist of??

perhaps putting far more people than they have there currently.

How many inspectors are there right now? 50-100?

I would say that a very small amount in comparison to the size of Iraq wouldn't you?

With that small band of inspectors it is a shell game that they can never win.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,874
6,409
126
Originally posted by: hagbard
Time for a review. Start at the beginning.

hehe, you old thread bumper you! :D I didn't notice the dates of the posts until half way through and after reading the article, I was like, "WTF, this is old news!" u got me!! :D

Now that the formalities are out of the way, I just gotta ask the Bush Defenders, "WTH constitutes a "reliable" source?". Bush and Co certainly can't be trusted as a "reliable source".
 

Jugernot

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,889
0
0
and that is a surprise? I personally think the Bust administration was betting they could find some WMD even though they had very little evidence of such in Iraq. I'm not saying Saddam didn't have any, I saying I doubt he still had them.

Bush is more corrupt than the guy walking around downtown handing out parking tickets.