some Cinebench r15 FX-8xxx module/thread scaling results

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
Now do the same without Turbo for the single thread.

It won't matter as much because IPC will just increase minimally but not be of much significance.

Also, i have disabled cores through BIOS, so when you see a single core or thread it means only a single core/thread was usable in the system. Same goes with Bulldozer Modules/Cores and Intel Cores/HT.

This would explain why your single-core rendering IPC results are lower than expected. Amdahl's law still holds true.
 

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
This is true for old static architectures with constant clock frequency and no shared components except memory bus.

With a shared cache and threads working on the same stuff they could help eachother as intelligent prefetchers (by not predicting but doing the real thing). That happens at multiple levels: shared L3$, shared L2$, shared I$ and in case of HT shared D$.

Citation needed