- Jan 12, 2004
- 11,078
- 11
- 81
A buddy of mine just sent this to me. I didnt write it, but I thought it was something some of the younger ATOTers should read...or even all of us:
case: 23 year old college student, driver of a 1999 Ford Ranger, only wanted "minimum coverage" which in the state of Pennsylvania is 15,000/30,000/5,000
15,000 - bodily injury per person
30,000 - bodily injury total for per accident
5,000 - property damage
that's $5,000 for all property damage! how many cars on the road are worth more than $5,000?
the gentleman in question had a typical rear-end collision at a red light, but the vehicle in question happend to be a 2004 Cadillac Catera, with a value of about $32,000. The impact was enough to bend the frame of the Cadillac that therefor, total the vehicle.
the $5,000 coverage for property damage to others left the insured about $27,000 short in covering the cost of the damage.
What does this mean? PERMANENT JUDGEMENT awarded to the claimant.
The insured did not have assets totalling this much, nor the money to pay for it (no house, no other owned property) so a judge has imposed a judgement that is permanent, for life. His driving privileges have been suspended and any time in the future the person tries to by property (i.e. a house or a car) a creditor will notice this and he will be unable to do so until the judgement is satisfied.
So - what does this mean - CARRY HIGHER LIMITS! - even an increase to 50,000/100,000/50,000 would have been more than enough to cover the claim, and would have cost the man $75 more a year in insurance premiums.
But that $75 a year is worth it to me to make up for a $27,000 judgement stapled to his credit.
As an agent I felt it was my duty to share this story ... I know there's a lot of young people, college students, people just starting out that may not have had a good education on insurance.
Thanks for listening.
