After reading the article here about the new Asus VIA KT400 board and the article at THG featuring 4 new KT400 boards, it's pretty clear that the KT400 chipset with PC3200 DDR sucks... which is a huge disappointment to myself and i'm sure many others. I'm currently looking to upgrade my current motherboard and RAM (KT133A w/512meg PC133 SDRAM) and had my sights set on a KT400 board and PC3200 DDR, so now i have no idea what to go for. I noticed that the performance of the KT400 with PC2700 DDR wasn't too bad, only slightly lower than that of a KT333 board, so would this be an option? I really like the features of the KT400, such as SATA, onboard IEEE 1394, USB 2.0 and AGP 8x (not that i will be using AGP 8x any time soon) so i am still leaning towards the KT400. Whichever i go for, it will be faster than the chipset/RAM i have now. So my question is, would it be better to go with the KT400 board with the features i want and use PC2700 DDR, or choose speed over features and go with a KT333 and PC2700?
Thanks in advance...
Chris
PS. I also plan to upgrade my processor to the Barton core 166/333fsb Athlon when they come out in October, so would the KT333 board support them or would i have to go with the KT400 for this processor?
Thanks in advance...
Chris
PS. I also plan to upgrade my processor to the Barton core 166/333fsb Athlon when they come out in October, so would the KT333 board support them or would i have to go with the KT400 for this processor?
