- Jul 29, 2001
- 39,398
- 19
- 81
Good article from toms highlighting "published" response time VS. real.
http://graphics.tomshardware.c...ay/20040923/index.html
Check out this graph of the new so called 8ms BenQ exceeding 22msmost of the time
http://graphics.tomshardware.c.../20041015/benq-03.html
I personally think after using both Samsung 213T and Dell FP the samsung is faster response dispite it 25ms rating. And IQ can't be compared. Samsung destroys all comers.
http://graphics.tomshardware.c...ay/20040923/index.html
This graph partly explains the success of the Hydis 20 ms panel. Its latency does reach 28 ms in the worst cases, but certain faster panels (some 16 ms models, for example) go well beyond these values, even though they do reach 16 ms at peaks. That's why the Hydis panels are known for being very responsive. They deviate less from their published specifications than their competitors do.
CRT's...response that's about 400 times faster than that of an average TFT.
Check out this graph of the new so called 8ms BenQ exceeding 22msmost of the time
http://graphics.tomshardware.c.../20041015/benq-03.html
I personally think after using both Samsung 213T and Dell FP the samsung is faster response dispite it 25ms rating. And IQ can't be compared. Samsung destroys all comers.
