So would Abraham Lincoln have a shot in today?s political atmosphere?
It seems like style over substance is the rule in politics. The start of the TV age in American politics has had a drastic effect on how candidates are perceived, regardless of how smart or good for the job they may be. If Nixon isn?t sick, sweating and fidgety in 1960, Kennedy probably loses.
Back to my original point. In this age of image, does a candidate similar to Abraham Lincoln have a shot? For background, I found this on the web:
?Abraham Lincoln was a Southern poor white, poorly educated and unusually ugly, awkward, ill-dressed. He liked smutty stories and was a politician down to his toes. Aristocrats?Jeff Davis, Seward and their ilk?despised him, and indeed he had little outwardly that compelled respect. But in that curious human way he was big inside. He had reserves and depths and when habit and convention were torn away there was something left to Lincoln?nothing to most of his contemners. There was some?thing left, so that at the crisis he was big enough to be inconsistent?cruel, merciful; peace-loving, a fighter; despising Negroes and letting them fight and vote; protecting slavery and freeing slaves. He was a man?a big, inconsistent, brave man.?
It saddens me to accept that once of the greatest leaders of our time would not stand a chance today. Guys like Kerry and Dole have to overcome more obstacles than the ?natural? American leaders we have elected in past few decades. A presidential candidate that doesn?t fit the image usually has no shot.
It seems like style over substance is the rule in politics. The start of the TV age in American politics has had a drastic effect on how candidates are perceived, regardless of how smart or good for the job they may be. If Nixon isn?t sick, sweating and fidgety in 1960, Kennedy probably loses.
Back to my original point. In this age of image, does a candidate similar to Abraham Lincoln have a shot? For background, I found this on the web:
?Abraham Lincoln was a Southern poor white, poorly educated and unusually ugly, awkward, ill-dressed. He liked smutty stories and was a politician down to his toes. Aristocrats?Jeff Davis, Seward and their ilk?despised him, and indeed he had little outwardly that compelled respect. But in that curious human way he was big inside. He had reserves and depths and when habit and convention were torn away there was something left to Lincoln?nothing to most of his contemners. There was some?thing left, so that at the crisis he was big enough to be inconsistent?cruel, merciful; peace-loving, a fighter; despising Negroes and letting them fight and vote; protecting slavery and freeing slaves. He was a man?a big, inconsistent, brave man.?
It saddens me to accept that once of the greatest leaders of our time would not stand a chance today. Guys like Kerry and Dole have to overcome more obstacles than the ?natural? American leaders we have elected in past few decades. A presidential candidate that doesn?t fit the image usually has no shot.