If we were just to compare raw hardware features/upgradability, doesn't an Nforce system always win?
I'd say eye-candy is eye-candy, and they both look pretty comperable. But the SN41G2 has better sound and video. And socket A chips are usually more affordable. (That said, I've been running Intel for about a year and have loved it.) It just seems to me that if I'm paying $300+ for a mini-system, I'd better be darned sure I'm getting the most for my money.
Unless you can definitively add in other aspects, like noise, heat, then they're pretty even.
Where is the gBox getting high priase?
EDIT: You must be talking about
this thread. I don't know... if I could get it for $250 then maybe I'd go for it, but... the nforce is looking technically superior, and for only about $25 more, it's not a big deal. If I were a diehard Intel fanboy, then the gbox would probably be great, but I'm just looking for the best (it turns out I end up swapping between intel and AMD at every upgrade

). Feel free to convince me of the error of my ways
For the SB51G, you can only OC up to about 140FSB (which isn't bad if you do the pin mod on a 400 MHz chip like my 1.6a). For the gbox blue, it looks the same - about 140 MHz. For the SB41G2, I see people pushing their chips to 166+ FSBs. I'm thinking the SN41G2 and a 2100+ is a good place to be.