• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

so whats the consensus on Seti 3.0 GUI and CL?

B

Ben98SentraSE

Senior member
(refering to the Windows clients)

1. Are both slower overall on every type of system?

2. Is one of them faster overall? Like we decided GUI 2.70 was faster than GUI 2.04 or CL 2.4. What's the case now? GUI or CL 3.0?

(linux question)

Is 3.0 faster or slower than 2.4 in linux? Also what is the difference between
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gnulibc2.1
i386-pc-linux-gnulibc1-static

Are they just using different libraries? I think I've run both of them so I think my system has all the necessary libraries. Is one of these faster than the other?

Also, has anyone tested an i686 client versus an i386 client and seen a difference?
 
I have switched to the3.0 cli.
On a k62-350 it has added 2-4hrs per WU
on a p3-500 (kat) it has added 1/2 hr
Nothing else switched over yet----looks like i'll be doing a couple less WU's a day from here on out with this kind of increase in times.🙁
 
Yeah, I'm too damn fast...
Especially with my Duron 600 running stable at 1081 😀
+33 memory, 2,2,2 and 4 way set...
only bad thing is my bus can't get higher then 103 :disgust:
 
heheh....
Sorry I had to toss that out after you talking about your 3 hour seti times on your ass hauling Tbird.. 🙂
 
🙂

it doesn't feel fast anymore... i need to get one of those new 1.2ghz and overclock that one...

get it down to 2 hours per... when the quad boards come out get a three more... and i'll have one computer cranking out 48 workunits a day... wouldn't that be something?
 
I loaded the 3.0 CLI on my 700@933 and time went from 4.8-5.3 (with the 2.4) down to 3.6-4.2 so I'm quite happy with that. I guess I will leave 2.4 on my 550 katmai though but I'll need to load the 3.0 on my parents 600 coppermine too. 🙂
 
With my Cel 550 ,Cli v2.4 was doing around 7.7-8.2 hrs/WU ,with Cli v3.0 I got these times.

10/12 Thu 12:08am 39e4f2f0 qresult.543 5h29m08s ASSIMILATOR
10/12 Thu 5:24am 39e53ce9 qresult.544 5h15m35s ASSIMILATOR
10/12 Thu 10:36am 39e5862e qresult.545 5h12m36s ASSIMILATOR
10/12 Thu 5:31pm 39e5e75a qresult.546 6h54m35s ASSIMILATOR
10/13 Fri 12:46am 39e64d63 qresult.547 7h05m11s ASSIMILATOR
10/13 Fri 7:39am 39e6ae3d qresult.548 6h53m13s ASSIMILATOR
10/13 Fri 5:38pm 39e73a81 qresult.549 9h58m27s ASSIMILATOR

Mostly faster 🙂

Though with my PII 280 it is mostly slower (confirming what HB said about off die L2 cpu's) ,with CLi v2.4 I used to get around 10.6hrs/WU ,no I get this

10/11 Wed 9:24am 39e423d9 qresult.254 8h33m43s SISKO
10/11 Wed 9:27pm 39e4cd35 qresult.255 12h02m35s SISKO
10/12 Thu 9:35am 39e577de qresult.256 12h07m06s SISKO
10/12 Thu 9:10pm 39e61acf qresult.257 11h35m11s SISKO
10/13 Fri 7:53am 39e6b17b qresult.258 10h42m51s SISKO
10/13 Fri 4:27pm 39e729dc qresult.259 8h33m35s SISKO

Mostly slower ,I'm tempted to switch back to the older client for this PC but that kinda defeats the point of SETI.
I think I'll upgrade it instead 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top